M. F. Smith

617 total citations
21 papers, 436 citations indexed

About

M. F. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, M. F. Smith has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 436 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Sensory Systems and 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in M. F. Smith's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (6 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (3 papers). M. F. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (6 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (3 papers). M. F. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. M. F. Smith's co-authors include John C. Stevens, Heather Webb, J. Connell, James A. Hutchinson, Jez Buffin, David H. Llewellyn, George H. Elder, Stuart J. Smyth, A C J Hutchesson and J M Rattenbury and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Animal Science and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

In The Last Decade

M. F. Smith

21 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. F. Smith United Kingdom 11 194 182 97 71 69 21 436
Alison King United Kingdom 10 380 2.0× 355 2.0× 71 0.7× 11 0.2× 70 1.0× 17 607
Haya Levi Israel 12 393 2.0× 173 1.0× 123 1.3× 4 0.1× 36 0.5× 20 587
András Molnár Hungary 12 91 0.5× 40 0.2× 13 0.1× 60 0.8× 40 0.6× 64 536
Hanna Schöpper Austria 10 99 0.5× 60 0.3× 35 0.4× 8 0.1× 33 0.5× 15 338
Tomoko Shintani Japan 12 157 0.8× 80 0.4× 79 0.8× 2 0.0× 8 0.1× 48 558
L. Fisch United Kingdom 10 128 0.7× 67 0.4× 35 0.4× 72 1.0× 41 466
Norio Kasai Japan 11 189 1.0× 173 1.0× 48 0.5× 16 0.2× 25 353
Qingguo Chen China 11 201 1.0× 74 0.4× 17 0.2× 20 0.3× 3 0.0× 33 403
Su-Kyoung Park South Korea 11 86 0.4× 82 0.5× 118 1.2× 2 0.0× 28 0.4× 64 326
Marine Parodi France 10 133 0.7× 128 0.7× 63 0.6× 38 0.6× 27 371

Countries citing papers authored by M. F. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. F. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. F. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. F. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. F. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. F. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. F. Smith. The network helps show where M. F. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. F. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. F. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. F. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. F. Smith. M. F. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Reese, Sydney T, M. C. Pereira, J.L.M. Vasconcelos, et al.. (2016). Markers of pregnancy: how early can we detect pregnancies in cattle usingpregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) and microRNAs?. Animal Reproduction. 13(3). 200–208. 17 indexed citations
2.
Wallis, L. I., et al.. (2007). OP03.11: Clinically silent extracranial and intracranial hemorrhages—are these a significant pathology or not?. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 30(4). 466–466. 1 indexed citations
3.
Smith, M. F., et al.. (2004). Otoacoustic Emissions in Patients with Tinnitus and Normal Hearing. Otolaryngology. 131(2). 5 indexed citations
4.
Whitby, Elspeth, Paul D. Griffiths, S. Rutter, et al.. (2004). Frequency and Natural History of Subdural Hemorrhages in Babies and Relation to Obstetric Factors. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 59(12). 814–816. 9 indexed citations
5.
Shinn, Jennifer B., et al.. (1997). Ear drop ototoxicity: reality or myth?. PubMed. 18(6). 782–9; discussion 789. 22 indexed citations
6.
Manning, N. J., Norman Davies, S. E. Olpin, et al.. (1994). Prenatal diagnosis of glutathione synthase deficiency. Prenatal Diagnosis. 14(6). 475–478. 7 indexed citations
7.
Smith, M. F., et al.. (1994). Restaurant noise, hearing loss, and hearing aids.. PubMed. 161(1). 45–9. 34 indexed citations
8.
Llewellyn, David H., Stuart J. Smyth, George H. Elder, et al.. (1992). Homozygous acute intermittent porphyria: compound heterozygosity for adjacent base transitions in the same codon of the porphobilinogen deaminase gene. Human Genetics. 89(1). 97–98. 48 indexed citations
9.
Stevens, John C., Heather Webb, James A. Hutchinson, et al.. (1991). Evaluation of click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in the newborn. British Journal of Audiology. 25(1). 11–14. 28 indexed citations
10.
Stevens, John C., Heather Webb, M. F. Smith, & Jez Buffin. (1990). The effect of stimulus level on click evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem responses in neonates under intensive care. British Journal of Audiology. 24(5). 293–300. 10 indexed citations
11.
Stevens, John C., et al.. (1990). Click Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonatal Screening. Ear and Hearing. 11(2). 128–133. 66 indexed citations
12.
Stevens, John C., Heather Webb, James A. Hutchinson, et al.. (1989). Click evoked otoacoustic emissions compared with brain stem electric response.. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 64(8). 1105–1111. 45 indexed citations
13.
Stevens, John C., et al.. (1987). A comparison of oto-acoustic emissions and brain stem electric response audiometry in the normal newborn and babies admitted to a special care baby unit. Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement. 8(2). 95–104. 38 indexed citations
14.
Smith, M. F.. (1985). Conservation of hearing in acoustic schwannoma surgery.. PubMed. Suppl. 161–3. 9 indexed citations
15.
Johnson, Sandra, M. F. Smith, & R.G. Elmore. (1985). Effect of Unilateral Ovariectomy and Injection of Bovine Follicular Fluid on Gonadotropin Secretion and Compensatory Ovarian Hypertrophy in Prepuberal Heifers. Journal of Animal Science. 60(4). 1055–1060. 22 indexed citations
16.
Primhak, Robert, M. F. Smith, Anna Hill, & M E Morgan. (1985). PRIMARY THALAMIC HAEMORRHAGE IN FIRST WEEK OF LIFE. The Lancet. 325(8429). 635–635. 3 indexed citations
17.
Smith, M. F., Gregory S. Lewis, P.G. Harms, et al.. (1983). Pituitary and Ovarian Responses to Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone, Calf Removal and Progestogen in Anestrous Beef Cows2. Journal of Animal Science. 57(2). 418–424. 39 indexed citations
18.
Smith, M. F., et al.. (1973). Reconstruction of the Mastoidectized Ear. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 97(1). 74–76. 3 indexed citations
19.
Smith, M. F., et al.. (1972). An otologic tissue bank.. PubMed. 76(1). 134–41. 2 indexed citations
20.
McIntire, Floyd C. & M. F. Smith. (1958). A New Chemical Method for Measuring Cell Populations in Tissue Cultures.. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 98(1). 76–79. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026