Countries citing papers authored by M. F. Goodchild
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of M. F. Goodchild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. F. Goodchild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. F. Goodchild more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. F. Goodchild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. F. Goodchild. The network helps show where M. F. Goodchild may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. F. Goodchild
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. F. Goodchild.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. F. Goodchild based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. F. Goodchild. M. F. Goodchild is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Goodchild, M. F. & Linda Hill. (2008). Introduction to digital gazetteer research. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 22(10). 1039–1044.98 indexed citations
3.
Goodchild, M. F.. (2003). GEOSPATIAL DATA IN EMERGENCIES. IN: THE GEOGRAPHICAL DIMENSIONS OF TERRORISM.2 indexed citations
4.
Hunter, Gary J. & M. F. Goodchild. (1996). A new model for handling vector data uncertainty in geographic information systems. 8(1). 51–57.25 indexed citations
5.
Hunter, Gary J. & M. F. Goodchild. (1995). Dealing with error in spatial databases: a simple case study. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 61(5). 529–537.79 indexed citations
6.
Hunter, Gary J. & M. F. Goodchild. (1993). Managing uncertainty in spatial databases: putting theory into practice. 5(2). 55–62.43 indexed citations
7.
Goodchild, M. F., et al.. (1993). Digital soils databases for the United States.. 386–391.3 indexed citations
8.
Hamilton, Stephanie K., John M. Mélack, M. F. Goodchild, & William M. Lewis. (1992). Estimation of the fractal dimension of terrain from lake size distributions. 145–163.16 indexed citations
9.
Deichmann, Uwe, M. F. Goodchild, & Luc Anselin. (1992). Dealing with errors in socio-economic databases: selected findings of a national research initiative. 10(2). 12–22.1 indexed citations
10.
Goodchild, M. F.. (1991). The technological setting of GIS. 45–54.11 indexed citations
11.
Goodchild, M. F.. (1991). Issues of quality and uncertainty. 113–139.32 indexed citations
12.
Goodchild, M. F.. (1989). Optimal tiling for large cartographic databases. 444–451.6 indexed citations
13.
Goodchild, M. F.. (1986). The issue of professional standing in geography ( Canada).. 27. 5–13.1 indexed citations
14.
Goodchild, M. F., et al.. (1986). On the ordering of two-dimensional space: introduction and relation to tesseral principles.. 179–192.5 indexed citations
15.
Goodchild, M. F.. (1985). Questions, tools or paradigms: scientific geography in the 1980s.. 25. 3–14.
Goodchild, M. F. & Nina Lam. (1980). Areal interpolation: a variant of the traditional spatial problem.. 1(3). 297–312.265 indexed citations
18.
Goodchild, M. F. & Peter Booth. (1980). Location and allocation of recreation facilities: public swimming pools in London, Ontario.. 15(15). 35–51.3 indexed citations
19.
Goodchild, M. F.. (1979). Commentary: current issues in interaction.. 13. 85–89.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.