M. E. Parke

576 total citations
11 papers, 434 citations indexed

About

M. E. Parke is a scholar working on Oceanography, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, M. E. Parke has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 434 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Oceanography, 2 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in M. E. Parke's work include Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (9 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (7 papers) and Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (3 papers). M. E. Parke is often cited by papers focused on Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (9 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (7 papers) and Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (3 papers). M. E. Parke collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Belgium. M. E. Parke's co-authors include Timothy H. Dixon, C. K. Shum, C. King, Jean‐Marc Molines, Carl Wunsch, Philip Woodworth, C. Le Provost, Michael G. Schlax, S. M. Klosko and Craig C. Tierney and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

In The Last Decade

M. E. Parke

9 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. E. Parke United States	6	396	110	73	71	45	11	434
R. W. Agreen United States	11	455 1.1×	168 1.5×	122 1.7×	64 0.9×	41 0.9×	19	534
Craig C. Tierney United States	7	460 1.2×	192 1.7×	129 1.8×	29 0.4×	35 0.8×	7	480
G. T. Mitchum United States	4	324 0.8×	159 1.4×	93 1.3×	58 0.8×	20 0.4×	6	383
David L. Porter United States	9	391 1.0×	84 0.8×	100 1.4×	36 0.5×	14 0.3×	27	412
Philippe Escudier France	3	525 1.3×	226 2.1×	151 2.1×	125 1.8×	125 2.8×	3	618
M. Dorrer France	2	525 1.3×	225 2.0×	151 2.1×	134 1.9×	135 3.0×	3	619
R Savcenko Germany	10	278 0.7×	63 0.6×	55 0.8×	116 1.6×	68 1.5×	27	307
J. Dorandeu France	11	544 1.4×	192 1.7×	135 1.8×	80 1.1×	31 0.7×	21	589
Martin G. Scharffenberg Germany	7	394 1.0×	196 1.8×	154 2.1×	64 0.9×	43 1.0×	11	455
Andrew S. Trupin United States	5	314 0.8×	80 0.7×	151 2.1×	76 1.1×	46 1.0×	8	391

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Parke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Parke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Parke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Parke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Parke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Parke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Parke. The network helps show where M. E. Parke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. E. Parke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. E. Parke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. E. Parke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. E. Parke. M. E. Parke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Parke, M. E.. (2024). Luck is not a strategy: why Australia must join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. 12(1).

2.

Christensen, E. J., et al.. (2005). Topex/poseidon Altimeter, Orbit, And Sea Level Verification. 1. 214–221. 1 indexed citations

3.

Shum, C. K., Philip Woodworth, Ole Andersen, et al.. (1997). Accuracy assessment of recent ocean tide models. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 102(C11). 25173–25194. 249 indexed citations

4.

Haines, Bruce, E. J. Christensen, Rachel Norman, et al.. (1996). abstract) Altimeter Calibration and Geophysical Monitoring from Collocated Measurements at the Harvest Oil Platform. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 5 indexed citations

5.

Christensen, E. J., Bruce Haines, S. J. Keihm, et al.. (1994). Calibration of TOPEX/POSEIDON at Platform Harvest. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 99(C12). 24465–24485. 93 indexed citations

6.

Dixon, Timothy H. & M. E. Parke. (1983). Bathymetry estimates in the southern oceans from Seasat altimetry. Nature. 304(5925). 406–411. 46 indexed citations

7.

Parke, M. E. & D. Bhaskara Rao. (1983). Report of the NASA workshop on tidal research. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1 indexed citations

8.

Yoder, C. F., J. G. Williams, M. E. Parke, & J. O. Dickey. (1981). Short period tidal variations of earth rotation. 37. 213–217. 7 indexed citations

9.

Parke, M. E.. (1980). Detection of tides on the patagonian shelf by the seasat satellite radar altimeter: An initial comparison. Deep Sea Research Part A Oceanographic Research Papers. 27(3-4). 297–300. 8 indexed citations

10.

Tapley, B. D., George H. Born, Hanan Hagar, et al.. (1979). Seasat Altimeter Calibration: Initial Results. Science. 204(4400). 1410–1412. 20 indexed citations

11.

Parke, M. E.. (1978). Open ocean tide modelling. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact