Countries citing papers authored by M. Campbell‐Brown
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Campbell‐Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Campbell‐Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Campbell‐Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Campbell‐Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Campbell‐Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Campbell‐Brown. The network helps show where M. Campbell‐Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Campbell‐Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Campbell‐Brown.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Campbell‐Brown based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Campbell‐Brown. M. Campbell‐Brown is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wiegert, Paul, David L. Clark, M. Campbell‐Brown, & Peter Brown. (2017). Minor Planet 2017 MB_1 and the Alpha Capricornids Meteor Shower. 4415. 1.1 indexed citations
Campbell‐Brown, M.. (2016). Results from the Canadian Automated Meteor Observatory. 50.1 indexed citations
9.
Pokorný, Petr, David Vokrouhlický, M. Campbell‐Brown, David Nesvorný, & Peter Brown. (2013). Dynamical Model for the Toroidal Source of the Sporadic Meteoroid Complex. 45.1 indexed citations
10.
Bastien, R., P. Brown, M. Campbell‐Brown, et al.. (2013). The 2012 Draconid Storm as Observed by the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar and Potentially Sampled by ER-2 Aircraft. LPI. 1622.2 indexed citations
11.
Brown, Peter, R. Weryk, D. K. Wong, & M. Campbell‐Brown. (2012). The Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar II: A new Facility for Measurement of the Dust Environment in near-Earth space. 44.1 indexed citations
12.
Wiegert, Paul, Jérémie Vaubaillon, & M. Campbell‐Brown. (2008). Theoretical Modeling of the Sporadic Meteor Complex. LPICo. 1405. 8166.1 indexed citations
13.
Weryk, R., M. Campbell‐Brown, Paul Wiegert, et al.. (2008). Meteoroid Fragmentation as seen by the Canadian Automated Meteor Observatory (CAMO). 40.1 indexed citations
14.
Brown, Peter, et al.. (2006). The Bulk Density of Meteoroids from Electro-Optical Measurements. 26. 22.1 indexed citations
Webster, A. R., Peter Brown, J. Jones, K. J. Ellis, & M. Campbell‐Brown. (2004). Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR). Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 4(3). 679–684.29 indexed citations
17.
Campbell‐Brown, M., D. Koschny, Joe Zender, & Olivier Witasse. (2004). Model of the ablation of faint meteors. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 13–22.2 indexed citations
18.
Campbell‐Brown, M. & A. R. Hildebrand. (2004). A New Analysis of Data from the Meteorite Observation and Recovery Project. 36.1 indexed citations
19.
Zender, Joe, et al.. (2004). Video intensified camera setup of visual and meteor spectroscopy. 163–167.4 indexed citations
20.
Brown, Peter & M. Campbell‐Brown. (2003). The Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR): Early Results. DPS.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.