M. C. E. Galbraith

445 total citations
8 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

M. C. E. Galbraith is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, M. C. E. Galbraith has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 2 papers in Spectroscopy and 1 paper in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. Recurrent topics in M. C. E. Galbraith's work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (5 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers). M. C. E. Galbraith is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (5 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers). M. C. E. Galbraith collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and Netherlands. M. C. E. Galbraith's co-authors include Marc J. J. Vrakking, F. Lépine, Victor Despré, Alexander I. Kuleff, A. Marciniak, V. Loriot, Arnaud Rouzée, Ralf Tonner, U. Höfer and Manuel Marks and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

M. C. E. Galbraith

8 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. C. E. Galbraith Germany 8 262 99 63 45 40 8 327
Vasileios Balos Germany 12 173 0.7× 99 1.0× 116 1.8× 75 1.7× 59 1.5× 22 359
Sebastian Malerz Germany 9 204 0.8× 72 0.7× 19 0.3× 46 1.0× 28 0.7× 15 301
Mavis D. Boamah United States 9 230 0.9× 97 1.0× 25 0.4× 19 0.4× 31 0.8× 18 348
Inmaculada Garcı́a Cuesta Spain 14 186 0.7× 72 0.7× 77 1.2× 179 4.0× 27 0.7× 38 422
B. Wales Canada 9 197 0.8× 145 1.5× 21 0.3× 63 1.4× 60 1.5× 15 304
Mounir Ben El Hadj Rhouma Tunisia 12 285 1.1× 34 0.3× 59 0.9× 49 1.1× 40 1.0× 39 394
Manabu Kanno Japan 14 396 1.5× 126 1.3× 33 0.5× 72 1.6× 8 0.2× 36 515
Pan Ma China 14 348 1.3× 183 1.8× 122 1.9× 65 1.4× 9 0.2× 44 490
Hai‐Chou Chang Taiwan 8 412 1.6× 266 2.7× 36 0.6× 28 0.6× 17 0.4× 11 518

Countries citing papers authored by M. C. E. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. E. Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. E. Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. E. Galbraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. E. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. E. Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. E. Galbraith. The network helps show where M. C. E. Galbraith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. C. E. Galbraith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. C. E. Galbraith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. C. E. Galbraith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. C. E. Galbraith. M. C. E. Galbraith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Galbraith, M. C. E., et al.. (2018). Comparison of the periodic slab approach with the finite cluster description of metal–organic interfaces at the example of PTCDA on Ag(110). Journal of Computational Chemistry. 39(14). 844–852. 19 indexed citations
2.
Galbraith, M. C. E., Simona Scheit, Nikolay V. Golubev, et al.. (2017). Few-femtosecond passage of conical intersections in the benzene cation. Nature Communications. 8(1). 1018–1018. 48 indexed citations
3.
Galbraith, M. C. E., Christopher Smeenk, G. Reitsma, et al.. (2017). XUV-induced reactions in benzene on sub-10 fs timescale: nonadiabatic relaxation and proton migration. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 19(30). 19822–19828. 13 indexed citations
4.
Galbraith, M. C. E., G. Reitsma, Judith Durá, et al.. (2016). Communication: XUV transient absorption spectroscopy of iodomethane and iodobenzene photodissociation. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 145(1). 11101–11101. 30 indexed citations
5.
Marciniak, A., Victor Despré, T. Barillot, et al.. (2015). XUV excitation followed by ultrafast non-adiabatic relaxation in PAH molecules as a femto-astrochemistry experiment. Nature Communications. 6(1). 7909–7909. 58 indexed citations
6.
Despré, Victor, A. Marciniak, V. Loriot, et al.. (2015). Attosecond Hole Migration in Benzene Molecules Surviving Nuclear Motion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 6(3). 426–431. 95 indexed citations
7.
Galbraith, M. C. E., Manuel Marks, Ralf Tonner, & U. Höfer. (2013). Formation of an Organic/Metal Interface State from a Shockley Resonance. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 5(1). 50–55. 40 indexed citations
8.
Sacchi, Marco, M. C. E. Galbraith, & Stephen J. Jenkins. (2012). The interaction of iron pyrite with oxygen, nitrogen and nitrogen oxides: a first-principles study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 14(10). 3627–3627. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026