Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4
20151.8k citationsOlaf Conrad, Benjamin Bechtel et al.Geoscientific model developmentprofile →
System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4
2015671 citationsOlaf Conrad, Benjamin Bechtel et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Bock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Bock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Bock more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Bock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Bock. The network helps show where M. Bock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Bock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Bock.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Bock based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Bock. M. Bock is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Conrad, Olaf, Benjamin Bechtel, M. Bock, et al.. (2015). System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4.671 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Conrad, Olaf, Benjamin Bechtel, M. Bock, et al.. (2015). System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geoscientific model development. 8(7). 1991–2007.1800 indexed citations breakdown →
Kruse, Felix, et al.. (2014). Abschlussbericht: Faserverbundgerechte Großbauteile und Online-Qualitätssicherung im Autoklaven (GRONQA). elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Geoffrey M., et al.. (2013). The EAGLE concept - A vision of a future European Land Monitoring Framework. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.26 indexed citations
8.
Bock, M., et al.. (2012). Assessment of soil parent material formation in periglacial environments through medium scale landscape evolution modelling. EGUGA. 8796.1 indexed citations
Bock, M., et al.. (2012). IMPROVING THE PRODUCTION QUALITY OF THE ADVANCED AUTOMATED FIBER PLACEMENT PROCESS BY MEANS OF ONLINE PATH CORRECTION. elib (German Aerospace Center).12 indexed citations
11.
Bock, M., et al.. (2011). Online Bahnkorrektur eines Industrieroboters mittels optischer Sensoren für den Einsatz im Fiber-Placementprozess. elib (German Aerospace Center).6 indexed citations
12.
Dobos, Endre, et al.. (2010). Landform mapping for SOTER at scale 1:1 million using SRTM-DEM.. 68–71.
Wissen, Michael, et al.. (2001). Satellitenfernerkundung im Naturschutz - vom Pilotprojekt zur operationallen Anwendung. elib (German Aerospace Center).3 indexed citations
17.
Wissen, Michael, et al.. (2000). Integration of satellite data in a habitat monitoring GIS - a case study from Northern Germany. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.