Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future
2012354 citationsGerard F. Laniak, Jonathan L. Goodall et al.Environmental Modelling & Softwareprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Blind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Blind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Blind more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Blind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Blind. The network helps show where M. Blind may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Blind
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Blind.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Blind based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Blind. M. Blind is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Laniak, Gerard F., Jonathan L. Goodall, Alexey Voinov, et al.. (2012). Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future. Environmental Modelling & Software. 39. 3–23.354 indexed citations breakdown →
Bijlsma, Rianne, P. Groenendijk, P. C. M. Boers, & M. Blind. (2006). Uncertainty assessment on the nutrient concentration in the Regge catchment, Vecht River basin, the Netherlands. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.2 indexed citations
9.
Blind, M., et al.. (2005). The AquaStress integrated solutions support system. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1567–1573.1 indexed citations
10.
Blind, M., Roger Moore, H. Schölten, et al.. (2005). Current Results of the EC-sponsored Catchment Modelling (CatchMod) Cluster. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1210–1216.2 indexed citations
Blind, M.. (2004). ICT Requirements for an ‘evolutionary’ development of WFD compliant River Basin Management Plans. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University).2 indexed citations
16.
Blind, M., et al.. (2001). The generic framework - An open framework for model linkage and rapid decision support system development. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1601–1606.2 indexed citations
17.
Blind, M., et al.. (2001). Generic framework water: an open modelling system for efficient model linking in integrated water management - current status. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.3 indexed citations
18.
Blind, M., et al.. (2000). Model for Success. Water. 21. 43–45.19 indexed citations
19.
Blind, M., et al.. (2000). Towards a well-oiled model infrastructure for water management: the generic framework water program. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1–8.2 indexed citations
20.
Blind, M., et al.. (1983). Voice technology in Navy training systems.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.