This map shows the geographic impact of M B Dockerty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M B Dockerty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M B Dockerty more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M B Dockerty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M B Dockerty. The network helps show where M B Dockerty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M B Dockerty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M B Dockerty.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M B Dockerty based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M B Dockerty. M B Dockerty is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sedlack, Robert E., et al.. (1983). A decline in carcinoma of the stomach. A diagnostic artifact?. PubMed. 58(4). 255–60.13 indexed citations
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1972). Gastrocolic fistulas of malignant origin.. PubMed. 134(5). 829–32.24 indexed citations
4.
Arrigoni, M, et al.. (1971). The identification and treatment of mammary hamartoma.. PubMed. 133(4). 577–82.101 indexed citations
5.
Erich, John, et al.. (1966). Dermoids of the head and neck.. PubMed. 49(10). 1535–40.52 indexed citations
6.
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1964). MAMMARY CARCINOMA METASTASIS TO UTERINE MYOMA.. PubMed. 23. 229–31.7 indexed citations
7.
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1964). PELVIC RECURRENCE OF CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM.. PubMed. 118. 47–51.12 indexed citations
8.
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1960). Significant postmenopausal endometriosis.. PubMed. 111. 348–56.48 indexed citations
9.
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1960). Scirrhous carcinoma of the colon and rectum.. PubMed. 111. 759–66.47 indexed citations
10.
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1958). Cryptic cervical nodal metastases: a pathologic study of possible primary sources.. PubMed. 15(2). 87–95.1 indexed citations
11.
Kincaid, Owings W., John R. Hodgson, & M B Dockerty. (1957). Neuroblastoma: a roentgenologic and pathologic study.. PubMed. 78(3). 420–36.15 indexed citations
12.
Beahrs, Oliver H., et al.. (1957). Cervical metastasis from occult carcinoma.. PubMed. 104(5). 607–17.69 indexed citations
13.
Dockerty, M B, Thomas E. Lynn, & John M. Waugh. (1956). A clinicopathologic study of the epiploic appendages.. PubMed. 103(4). 423–33.84 indexed citations
14.
Johnson, Eric W., Ralph K. Ghormley, & M B Dockerty. (1956). Hemangiomas of the Extremities. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 18(2). 153–154.10 indexed citations
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1954). Carcinoma of the large intestine; a new approach to the study of venous spread.. PubMed. 98(1). 62–72.14 indexed citations
17.
Dockerty, M B. (1953). Certain small painful tumors of the extremities.. PubMed. 73(2). 57–62.1 indexed citations
18.
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1952). Lymphosarcoma of the small intestine.. PubMed. 95(1). 76–84.56 indexed citations
19.
Dockerty, M B, et al.. (1951). Preclinical Paget's disease of the nipple.. PubMed. 93(3). 317–20.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.