M. Armstrong‐James
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Electrochemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kevin FoxMathew E. DiamondFord F. EbnerJulian MillarF. F. EbnerChristopher A. CallahanJane MillarEgbert Welker
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (33 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (21 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
M. Armstrong‐James
44 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.8k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.6k
- Molecular Biology 478
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 348
- Electrochemistry 199
Countries citing papers authored by M. Armstrong‐James
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Armstrong‐James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Armstrong‐James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Armstrong‐James more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Armstrong‐James
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Armstrong‐James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Armstrong‐James. The network helps show where M. Armstrong‐James may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Armstrong‐James
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Armstrong‐James. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Armstrong‐James based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Armstrong‐James. M. Armstrong‐James is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 80 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 247 | |
| 8 | 198 | |
| 9 | 227 | |
| 10 | 126 | |
| 11 | 132 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 81 | |
| 17 | 313 | |
| 18 | 68 | |
| 19 | 113 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About M. Armstrong‐James
M. Armstrong‐James is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Electrochemistry, having authored 44 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (33 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (21 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.8k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.6k citations) and Sensory Systems (171 citations). M. Armstrong‐James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Fox, Mathew E. Diamond, Ford F. Ebner, Julian Millar, F. F. Ebner, Christopher A. Callahan, Jane Millar, Egbert Welker, V. Rema and M. J. George. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.