M. Acreman

3.5k total citations
70 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

M. Acreman is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Acreman has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Water Science and Technology, 22 papers in Ecology and 19 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in M. Acreman's work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (29 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (16 papers) and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (13 papers). M. Acreman is often cited by papers focused on Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (29 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (16 papers) and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (13 papers). M. Acreman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Switzerland. M. Acreman's co-authors include Joanne Fisher, Joseph Holden, Edward B. Barbier, Duncan Knowler, C. D. Sinclair, D. J. Booker, G. E. Hollis, David Tickner, Angela H. Arthington and Julian R. Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Hydrology, Environmental Microbiology and Journal of Environmental Quality.

In The Last Decade

M. Acreman

66 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Acreman United Kingdom	23	1.1k	1.0k	954	487	335	70	2.5k
Xiubo Yu China	25	1.1k 1.0×	474 0.5×	1.4k 1.5×	393 0.8×	133 0.4×	129	2.6k
Scott G. Leibowitz United States	33	1.7k 1.6×	1.5k 1.5×	1.2k 1.2×	912 1.9×	603 1.8×	75	3.5k
Piotr Wolski South Africa	35	950 0.8×	547 0.5×	1.2k 1.2×	328 0.7×	388 1.2×	101	2.8k
Yuan Jiang China	35	977 0.9×	813 0.8×	2.1k 2.2×	967 2.0×	389 1.2×	143	3.8k
Samantha J. Capon Australia	27	1.6k 1.4×	761 0.7×	903 0.9×	1.1k 2.3×	185 0.6×	73	2.8k
Brij Gopal India	26	1.6k 1.5×	369 0.4×	810 0.8×	591 1.2×	481 1.4×	79	3.0k
M. Siobhan Fennessy United States	27	1.8k 1.6×	405 0.4×	962 1.0×	659 1.4×	647 1.9×	68	3.1k
Dietrich Borchardt Germany	34	917 0.8×	1.3k 1.3×	478 0.5×	597 1.2×	872 2.6×	129	3.5k
Martin Kernan United Kingdom	20	1.0k 0.9×	946 0.9×	471 0.5×	545 1.1×	1.0k 3.0×	57	2.6k
S. Jannicke Moe Norway	24	1.1k 1.0×	625 0.6×	503 0.5×	682 1.4×	798 2.4×	75	2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Acreman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Acreman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Acreman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Acreman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Acreman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Acreman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Acreman. The network helps show where M. Acreman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Acreman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Acreman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Acreman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Acreman. M. Acreman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Arthington, Angela H., David Tickner, Michael E. McClain, et al.. (2023). Accelerating environmental flow implementation to bend the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss. Environmental Reviews. 32(3). 387–413. 28 indexed citations

Acreman, M., et al.. (2022). Evidence-based Risk Assessment of Ecological Damage due to Groundwater Abstraction; the Case of Doñana Natural Space, Spain. Wetlands. 42(7). 15 indexed citations

Thompson, Julian R., et al.. (2021). Impacts of climate change on environmental flows in West Africa's Upper Niger Basin and the Inner Niger Delta. Hydrology research. 52(4). 958–974. 10 indexed citations

Stubbington, Rachel, M. Acreman, Vicenç Acuña, et al.. (2020). Ecosystem services of temporary streams differ between wet and dry phases in regions with contrasting climates and economies. People and Nature. 2(3). 660–677. 35 indexed citations

Wilkes, Martin, Eva C. Enders, Ana Silva, M. Acreman, & Ian Maddock. (2017). Position choice and swimming costs of juvenile Atlantic salmon salmo salar in turbulent flow. Pure (Coventry University). 2(1). 16–27. 18 indexed citations

Thompson, Julian R., et al.. (2015). Modelling groundwater/surface water interaction in a managed riparian chalk valley wetland. Hydrological Processes. 30(3). 447–462. 35 indexed citations

Dollar, Evan S.J., François Edwards, Cédric Laizé, et al.. (2013). Monitoring and assessment of environmental impacts of droughts (SC120024): work package 4. Final report. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 1 indexed citations

Piniewski, Mikołaj, et al.. (2011). Estimation of environmental flows in semi-natural lowland rivers - the Narew basin case study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 20(5). 13 indexed citations

Walker, Susan, et al.. (2004). Delivering environmental improvements through integrated catchment management in sub-catchments of the River Dee, NE Scotland.. 520–525. 3 indexed citations

10.

Walters, Mark, et al.. (2004). Groundwater resources assessment: a decision-making framework to support Environment Agency business needs.. 383–391. 1 indexed citations

11.

Booker, D. J., et al.. (2003). PHYSICAL HABITAT ASSESSMENT IN URBAN RIVERS UNDER FUTURE FLOW SCENARIOS. Water and Environment Journal. 17(4). 251–256. 3 indexed citations

12.

Acreman, M., et al.. (2003). Hydrological impacts of floodplain restoration: a case study of the River Cherwell, UK. Hydrology and earth system sciences. 7(1). 75–85. 86 indexed citations

13.

Maltby, Edward, et al.. (1999). Ecosystem management : questions for science and society. Synthesis of the first Sibthorp Seminar. 3 indexed citations

14.

Steiner, Achim, et al.. (1997). Large dams : learning from the past, looking at the future. Workshop proceedings. IUCN eBooks. 13 indexed citations

15.

Acreman, M., Edward B. Barbier, & Duncan Knowler. (1997). Economic valuation of wetlands: A guide for policy makers and planners. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 40(3). 147–8. 352 indexed citations

16.

Acreman, M. & G. E. Hollis. (1996). Water management and wetlands in sub-Saharan Africa.. IUCN eBooks. 58 indexed citations

17.

Thomas, David, M. Acreman, & G. E. Hollis. (1996). Water management and rural development in the Hadejia-Nguru wetlands, north-east Nigeria.. 91–100. 1 indexed citations

18.

Acreman, M.. (1994). Assessing the Joint Probability of Fluvial and Tidal Floods in the River Roding. Water and Environment Journal. 8(5). 490–496. 14 indexed citations

19.

Acreman, M.. (1985). Predicting the mean annual flood from basin characteristics in Scotland. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 30(1). 37–49. 26 indexed citations

20.

Acreman, M.. (1983). The significance of the flood of September 1981 on the Ardessie Burn, Wester Ross. Scottish Geographical Magazine. 99(3). 150–161. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact