M. A. Ford

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
27 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

M. A. Ford is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. A. Ford has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Plant Science, 18 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in M. A. Ford's work include Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (16 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (13 papers) and Genetics and Plant Breeding (7 papers). M. A. Ford is often cited by papers focused on Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (16 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (13 papers) and Genetics and Plant Breeding (7 papers). M. A. Ford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hungary. M. A. Ford's co-authors include R. B. Austin, Colin Morgan, R. D. Blackwell, GILLIAN N. THORNE, Jon‐Paul Bingham, L. T. Evans, S. G. Bhagwat, Monica Parker, D. J. WATSON and D.M. Miles and has published in prestigious journals such as New Phytologist, British Journal Of Nutrition and Annals of Botany.

In The Last Decade

M. A. Ford

27 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 an... 1980 2026 1995 2010 1980 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. A. Ford United Kingdom 21 2.0k 1.3k 241 237 123 27 2.2k
W. G. Duncan United States 21 1.6k 0.8× 819 0.6× 235 1.0× 332 1.4× 163 1.3× 37 2.0k
LT Evans Australia 25 2.0k 1.0× 942 0.7× 178 0.7× 227 1.0× 248 2.0× 46 2.3k
R. B. Pearce United States 19 1.2k 0.6× 509 0.4× 239 1.0× 135 0.6× 131 1.1× 38 1.4k
E. J. M. Kirby Hungary 34 2.8k 1.4× 2.0k 1.6× 341 1.4× 196 0.8× 369 3.0× 69 3.2k
R. D. Blackwell Hungary 15 1.5k 0.7× 914 0.7× 196 0.8× 108 0.5× 74 0.6× 19 1.6k
RA Fischer Australia 21 3.2k 1.7× 1.7k 1.3× 448 1.9× 250 1.1× 185 1.5× 26 3.6k
AG Condon Australia 13 1.5k 0.8× 468 0.4× 233 1.0× 517 2.2× 87 0.7× 16 1.8k
D. W. Stewart Canada 19 1.1k 0.6× 710 0.6× 241 1.0× 118 0.5× 95 0.8× 33 1.4k
Gregory O. Edmeades Australia 11 1.5k 0.8× 748 0.6× 216 0.9× 210 0.9× 202 1.6× 12 1.8k
MM Ludlow Australia 22 1.1k 0.6× 333 0.3× 236 1.0× 555 2.3× 119 1.0× 31 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by M. A. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. A. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. A. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. A. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. A. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. A. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. A. Ford. The network helps show where M. A. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. A. Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. A. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. A. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. A. Ford. M. A. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moot, Derrick J., et al.. (1996). Rate of change in harvest index during grain-filling of wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 126(4). 387–395. 36 indexed citations
2.
Morgan, Colin, R. B. Austin, M. A. Ford, et al.. (1989). An evaluation of F1 hybrid winter wheat genotypes produced using a chemical hybridizing agent. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 112(2). 143–149. 21 indexed citations
3.
Austin, R. B., M. A. Ford, & Colin Morgan. (1989). Genetic improvement in the yield of winter wheat: a further evaluation. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 112(3). 295–301. 195 indexed citations
4.
Austin, R. B., Colin Morgan, & M. A. Ford. (1986). Dry Matter Yields and Photosynthetic Rates of Diploid and Hexaploid Triticum Species. Annals of Botany. 57(6). 847–857. 30 indexed citations
5.
SCOTT, P. R., et al.. (1985). Some effects of canopy structure and microclimate on infection of tall and short wheats by Septoria nodorum. Plant Pathology. 34(4). 578–593. 25 indexed citations
6.
Parker, Monica & M. A. Ford. (1982). The Structure of the Mesophyll of Flag Leaves in Three Triticum Species. Annals of Botany. 49(2). 165–176. 42 indexed citations
7.
Austin, R. B., Colin Morgan, M. A. Ford, & S. G. Bhagwat. (1982). Flag Leaf Photosynthesis of Triticum aestivum and Related Diploid and Tetraploid Species. Annals of Botany. 49(2). 177–189. 155 indexed citations
8.
Blackwell, R. D., et al.. (1981). The effects of selection for number of ears on the yield and water economy of winter wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 97(3). 523–532. 33 indexed citations
9.
Hanson, Peter, et al.. (1981). Comparison of spring barley varieties grown in England and Wales between 1880 and 1980. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 97(3). 599–610. 99 indexed citations
10.
Ford, M. A., et al.. (1981). Relationships between the responses of spring wheat genotypes to temperature and photoperiodic treatments and their performance in the field. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 96(3). 623–634. 26 indexed citations
12.
Austin, R. B., Jon‐Paul Bingham, R. D. Blackwell, et al.. (1980). Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 94(3). 675–689. 603 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Austin, R. B., Colin Morgan, M. A. Ford, & R. D. Blackwell. (1980). Contributions to Grain Yield from Pre-anthesis Assimilation in Tall and Dwarf Barley Phenotypes in Two Contrasting Seasons. Annals of Botany. 45(3). 309–319. 141 indexed citations
14.
Austin, R. B., et al.. (1977). The Fate of the Dry Matter, Carbohydrates and 14C Lost from the Leaves and Stems of Wheat during Grain Filling. Annals of Botany. 41(6). 1309–1321. 174 indexed citations
15.
Austin, R. B., et al.. (1976). Some effects of leaf posture on photosynthesis and yield in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology. 83(3). 425–446. 49 indexed citations
16.
Ford, M. A. & GILLIAN N. THORNE. (1975). Effects of variation in temperature and light intensity at different times on growth and yield of spring wheat. Annals of Applied Biology. 80(3). 283–299. 20 indexed citations
17.
Ford, M. A. & GILLIAN N. THORNE. (1974). Effects of Atmospheric Humidity on Plant Growth. Annals of Botany. 38(2). 441–452. 52 indexed citations
18.
THORNE, GILLIAN N., M. A. Ford, & D. J. WATSON. (1968). Growth, Development, and Yield of Spring Wheat in Artificial Climates. Annals of Botany. 32(2). 425–446. 45 indexed citations
19.
Ford, M. A. & GILLIAN N. THORNE. (1967). Effect of CO2 Concentration on Growth of Sugar-beet, Barley, Kale, and Maize. Annals of Botany. 31(4). 629–644. 69 indexed citations
20.
THORNE, GILLIAN N., M. A. Ford, & D. J. WATSON. (1967). Effects of Temperature Variation at Different Times on Growth and Yield of Sugar Beet and Barley. Annals of Botany. 31(1). 71–101. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026