Lydia Bird

419 total citations
10 papers, 272 citations indexed

About

Lydia Bird is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lydia Bird has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 272 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Lydia Bird's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers). Lydia Bird is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers). Lydia Bird collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Lydia Bird's co-authors include Karen Cox, Jane Seymour, Antony Arthur, Ruth Elkan, Nima Moghaddam, Wendy Stanton, Arun Kumar, Ruth Parry, Sheila Suess Kennedy and Kristian Pollock and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, BMC Medical Research Methodology and European Journal of Oncology Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Lydia Bird

10 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lydia Bird United Kingdom 7 153 100 67 47 42 10 272
Salman Barasteh Iran 8 146 1.0× 102 1.0× 80 1.2× 31 0.7× 31 0.7× 33 255
Vanessa Romotzky Germany 10 237 1.5× 95 0.9× 68 1.0× 46 1.0× 24 0.6× 15 282
Catarina Wallengren Sweden 12 104 0.7× 162 1.6× 43 0.6× 27 0.6× 56 1.3× 23 354
Gesine Benze Germany 7 195 1.3× 72 0.7× 68 1.0× 55 1.2× 87 2.1× 12 303
Tina M. Mason United States 10 177 1.2× 118 1.2× 168 2.5× 32 0.7× 52 1.2× 44 370
Mamak Tahmasebi Iran 13 191 1.2× 111 1.1× 63 0.9× 105 2.2× 58 1.4× 42 347
Ludovica De Panfilis Italy 12 215 1.4× 127 1.3× 84 1.3× 32 0.7× 18 0.4× 39 327
Nasrin Rezaee Iran 9 85 0.6× 91 0.9× 100 1.5× 30 0.6× 24 0.6× 62 284
Serge Daneault Canada 11 222 1.5× 109 1.1× 96 1.4× 88 1.9× 50 1.2× 33 341
Sidsel Ellingsen Norway 9 218 1.4× 130 1.3× 71 1.1× 58 1.2× 63 1.5× 26 369

Countries citing papers authored by Lydia Bird

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lydia Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lydia Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lydia Bird more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lydia Bird

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lydia Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lydia Bird. The network helps show where Lydia Bird may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lydia Bird

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lydia Bird. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lydia Bird based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lydia Bird. Lydia Bird is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Johnston, Bridget, et al.. (2018). Impact of the Macmillan specialist Care at Home service: a mixed methods evaluation across six sites. BMC Palliative Care. 17(1). 36–36. 17 indexed citations
3.
Kennedy, Sheila Suess, et al.. (2015). Improving support for older people looking after someone with advanced cancer. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 2 indexed citations
4.
Parry, Ruth, et al.. (2013). Rapid evidence review: pathways focused on the dying phase in end of life care and their key components. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University). 28 indexed citations
5.
Barclay, David R., et al.. (2013). How do nurses in specialist palliative care assess and manage breakthrough cancer pain? A multicentre study. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 19(11). 528–534. 5 indexed citations
6.
Bird, Lydia, et al.. (2012). Liminality as a framework for understanding the experience of cancer survivorship: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 68(10). 2155–2164. 80 indexed citations
7.
Cox, Karen, Lydia Bird, Antony Arthur, et al.. (2012). Public attitudes to death and dying in the UK: a review of published literature. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 3(1). 37–45. 47 indexed citations
8.
Bird, Lydia, Antony Arthur, & Karen Cox. (2011). "Did the trial kill the intervention?" experiences from the development, implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 11(1). 24–24. 33 indexed citations
9.
Cox, Karen, Nima Moghaddam, Lydia Bird, & Ruth Elkan. (2010). Feedback of trial results to participants: A survey of clinicians’ and patients’ attitudes and experiences. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 15(2). 124–129. 41 indexed citations
10.
Bird, Lydia, et al.. (2010). Rehabilitation programme after stem cell transplantation: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 66(3). 607–615. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026