Lutz Geldsetzer

401 total citations
14 papers, 76 citations indexed

About

Lutz Geldsetzer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Lutz Geldsetzer has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 76 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in History and Philosophy of Science. Recurrent topics in Lutz Geldsetzer's work include Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Philosophy and Historical Thought (2 papers). Lutz Geldsetzer is often cited by papers focused on Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Philosophy and Historical Thought (2 papers). Lutz Geldsetzer collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Lutz Geldsetzer's co-authors include Maurice Halbwachs, Georges Gurvitch, Richard L. Schwartz, Mike Sandbothe and Dieter Birnbacher and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Kant-Studien and Monumenta Serica.

In The Last Decade

Lutz Geldsetzer

10 papers receiving 42 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lutz Geldsetzer Germany	5	35	21	10	10	9	14	76
K. M. Baker United States	3	17 0.5×	13 0.6×	15 1.5×	3 0.3×	8 0.9×	4	63
Max Stirner	4	39 1.1×	18 0.9×	11 1.1×	2 0.2×	4 0.4×	10	69
Maurice Wiles United Kingdom	6	64 1.8×	25 1.2×	10 1.0×	3 0.3×	5 0.6×	45	120
J. Gerald Janzen United States	6	36 1.0×	21 1.0×	5 0.5×	7 0.7×	3 0.3×	31	93
Shlomo Pines Türkiye	7	39 1.1×	48 2.3×	29 2.9×	11 1.1×	2 0.2×	23	96
Birger Gerhardsson Sweden	5	65 1.9×	10 0.5×	7 0.7×	4 0.4×	3 0.3×	16	113
David Friedrich Strauß	3	26 0.7×	15 0.7×	9 0.9×	2 0.2×	6 0.7×	8	67
Thomas More	5	26 0.7×	13 0.6×	11 1.1×	6 0.6×	2 0.2×	32	84
Alfred L. Ivry United States	6	29 0.8×	62 3.0×	22 2.2×	10 1.0×	4 0.4×	27	82
William Paley	4	26 0.7×	19 0.9×	29 2.9×	5 0.5×	13 1.4×	17	78

Countries citing papers authored by Lutz Geldsetzer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lutz Geldsetzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lutz Geldsetzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lutz Geldsetzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lutz Geldsetzer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lutz Geldsetzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lutz Geldsetzer. The network helps show where Lutz Geldsetzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lutz Geldsetzer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lutz Geldsetzer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lutz Geldsetzer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lutz Geldsetzer. Lutz Geldsetzer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Geldsetzer, Lutz & Richard L. Schwartz. (2012). Logical Thinking in the Pyramidal Schema of Concepts: The Logical and Mathematical Elements. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 1 indexed citations

2.

Geldsetzer, Lutz. (1999). DaoAls Metaphysisches Prinzip Bei Lao Zi Einige Gedanken Zur Logik Der Metaphysischen Begriffsbildung. Monumenta Serica. 47(1). 237–254. 1 indexed citations

3.

Geldsetzer, Lutz, et al.. (1998). Grundlagen der Chinesischen Philosophie. Reclam eBooks. 3 indexed citations

4.

Geldsetzer, Lutz & Mike Sandbothe. (1991). Reviews. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 22(2). 357–368. 1 indexed citations

5.

Geldsetzer, Lutz, et al.. (1986). Chinesisch-Deutsches Lexikon der Chinesischen Philosophie. 1 indexed citations

6.

Geldsetzer, Lutz, et al.. (1986). Rezensionen. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 17(2). 380–390.

7.

Geldsetzer, Lutz. (1975). Geschichte der Philosophie. 5 indexed citations

8.

Geldsetzer, Lutz. (1975). Structuralism. Moscow—Prague—Paris. 8(2). 173–175. 1 indexed citations

9.

Geldsetzer, Lutz. (1968). Die Philosophie der Philosophiegeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert : zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Philosophiegeschichtsschreibung und -betrachtung. 2 indexed citations

10.

Geldsetzer, Lutz. (1968). Die Philosophie der Philosophiegeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert. 5 indexed citations

11.

Halbwachs, Maurice & Lutz Geldsetzer. (1966). Das Gedächtnis und seine sozialen Bedingungen. Luchterhand eBooks. 39 indexed citations

12.

Geldsetzer, Lutz, et al.. (1966). Lexicon philosophicum terminorum philosophis usitatorum. Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. 10 indexed citations

13.

Gurvitch, Georges & Lutz Geldsetzer. (1965). Dialektik und Soziologie. Luchterhand eBooks. 2 indexed citations

14.

Geldsetzer, Lutz. (1965). DER METHODENSTREIT IN DER PHILOSOPHIEGESCHICHTSSCHREIBUNG 1791—1820. Kant-Studien. 56(3-4). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact