Luke Pearce

413 total citations
10 papers, 163 citations indexed

About

Luke Pearce is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke Pearce has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 163 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 7 papers in Ecology and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Luke Pearce's work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (7 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (3 papers) and Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (3 papers). Luke Pearce is often cited by papers focused on Fish Ecology and Management Studies (7 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (3 papers) and Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (3 papers). Luke Pearce collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and New Zealand. Luke Pearce's co-authors include Matthew R. Miller, Jonas Bylemans, Dianne Gleeson, Elise M. Furlan, A. J. McLachlan, Charles R. Todd, John D. Koehn, John R. Morrongiello, Paul Humphries and Dean M. Gilligan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Animal Ecology, Molecular Ecology and Nutrients.

In The Last Decade

Luke Pearce

10 papers receiving 148 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luke Pearce Australia 7 100 63 56 36 34 10 163
Dayne Buddo Jamaica 6 184 1.8× 54 0.9× 149 2.7× 76 2.1× 10 0.3× 9 274
Cesare Puzzi Italy 7 43 0.4× 62 1.0× 15 0.3× 18 0.5× 68 2.0× 12 128
J. R. Watson Australia 9 140 1.4× 134 2.1× 23 0.4× 30 0.8× 45 1.3× 20 248
Svend Jørgen Steenfeldt Denmark 9 32 0.3× 48 0.8× 31 0.6× 48 1.3× 227 6.7× 11 282
Marlies Messiaen Belgium 6 64 0.6× 22 0.3× 11 0.2× 20 0.6× 20 0.6× 7 154
I. Opstad Norway 10 41 0.4× 86 1.4× 53 0.9× 67 1.9× 308 9.1× 13 352
Luboš Kočvara Czechia 9 147 1.5× 189 3.0× 35 0.6× 86 2.4× 75 2.2× 30 240
Rémy Simide France 7 46 0.5× 21 0.3× 14 0.3× 13 0.4× 37 1.1× 13 161
Chloé Goulon France 8 92 0.9× 108 1.7× 15 0.3× 53 1.5× 25 0.7× 21 156
S. M. Adams United States 6 134 1.3× 124 2.0× 14 0.3× 42 1.2× 203 6.0× 11 341

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Pearce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Pearce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Pearce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Pearce. The network helps show where Luke Pearce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Pearce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Pearce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Pearce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Pearce. Luke Pearce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Pavlova, Alexandra, Zeb Tonkin, Luke Pearce, et al.. (2025). A Shift to Metapopulation Genetic Management for Persistence of a Species Threatened by Fragmentation: The Case of an Endangered Australian Freshwater Fish. Molecular Ecology. 34(23). e70005–e70005. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pavlova, Alexandra, et al.. (2024). Immediate Genetic Augmentation and Enhanced Habitat Connectivity Are Required to Secure the Future of an Iconic Endangered Freshwater Fish Population. Evolutionary Applications. 17(10). e70019–e70019. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pearce, Luke, et al.. (2021). The value of quantitative environmental DNA analyses for the management of invasive and endangered native fish. Freshwater Biology. 66(8). 1619–1629. 10 indexed citations
4.
Koehn, John D., Stephen R. Balcombe, Lee J. Baumgartner, et al.. (2020). What is needed to restore native fishes in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin?. Marine and Freshwater Research. 71(11). 1464–1468. 13 indexed citations
5.
Todd, Charles R., et al.. (2017). Forgotten fishes: What is the future for small threatened freshwater fish? Population risk assessment for southern pygmy perch, Nannoperca australis. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 27(6). 1290–1300. 21 indexed citations
6.
Bylemans, Jonas, et al.. (2016). Improving the containment of a freshwater invader using environmental DNA (eDNA) based monitoring. Biological Invasions. 18(10). 3081–3089. 43 indexed citations
7.
Pearce, Luke. (2014). Conservation management of southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) in NSW, in the context of climactic extremes and alien species. Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO). 2 indexed citations
8.
Miller, Matthew R., et al.. (2014). Detailed Distribution of Lipids in Greenshell™ Mussel (Perna canaliculus). Nutrients. 6(4). 1454–1474. 43 indexed citations
9.
Gilligan, Dean M., et al.. (2010). The distribution and abundance of two endangered fish species in the NSW Upper Murray Catchment.. 8 indexed citations
10.
McLachlan, A. J., et al.. (1979). Feeding Interactions and Cycling of Peat in a Bog Lake. Journal of Animal Ecology. 48(3). 851–851. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026