Luke E. Miller

5.8k total citations
42 papers, 881 citations indexed

About

Luke E. Miller is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke E. Miller has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 881 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Luke E. Miller's work include Motor Control and Adaptation (14 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (13 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (13 papers). Luke E. Miller is often cited by papers focused on Motor Control and Adaptation (14 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (13 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (13 papers). Luke E. Miller collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Luke E. Miller's co-authors include Ayşe Pınar Saygın, Matthew R. Longo, C.C.A.M. Gielen, Alessandro Farnè, Roméo Salemme, A. P. Saygin, Éric Koun, Vincent Hayward, C.A.M. Doorenbosch and Megan K. MacPherson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Luke E. Miller

38 papers receiving 853 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luke E. Miller United States 16 585 314 163 136 120 42 881
Ada Kritikos Australia 18 669 1.1× 322 1.0× 129 0.8× 63 0.5× 59 0.5× 63 878
Adam Galpin United Kingdom 16 340 0.6× 238 0.8× 80 0.5× 271 2.0× 62 0.5× 42 811
Michiel Spapé Finland 22 978 1.7× 313 1.0× 286 1.8× 34 0.3× 178 1.5× 72 1.3k
Miriam Spering Canada 25 1.1k 1.9× 177 0.6× 119 0.7× 46 0.3× 173 1.4× 73 1.5k
Marnix Naber Netherlands 18 1.1k 1.9× 247 0.8× 210 1.3× 57 0.4× 107 0.9× 70 1.4k
Ivo Käthner Germany 13 888 1.5× 155 0.5× 140 0.9× 84 0.6× 312 2.6× 26 1.3k
Vikram S. Chib United States 14 775 1.3× 127 0.4× 144 0.9× 148 1.1× 28 0.2× 38 1.1k
Pierre‐Michel Bernier Canada 22 1.0k 1.7× 272 0.9× 48 0.3× 258 1.9× 72 0.6× 67 1.4k
Philippe Vindras France 15 789 1.3× 277 0.9× 61 0.4× 199 1.5× 27 0.2× 20 982
Mauro Murgia Italy 17 430 0.7× 255 0.8× 148 0.9× 52 0.4× 22 0.2× 62 930

Countries citing papers authored by Luke E. Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke E. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke E. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke E. Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke E. Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke E. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke E. Miller. The network helps show where Luke E. Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke E. Miller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke E. Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke E. Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke E. Miller. Luke E. Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2024). Bayesian inference in arm posture perception. Journal of Neurophysiology. 132(5). 1639–1649.
2.
Salemme, Roméo, et al.. (2024). Alpha oscillations reflect similar mapping mechanisms for localizing touch on hands and tools. iScience. 27(3). 109092–109092.
3.
Miller, Luke E. & Alessandro Farnè. (2024). Extending Tactile Space With Handheld Tools: A Re-Analysis and Review. Multisensory Research. 1–19.
4.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2024). Biases in hand perception are driven by somatosensory computations, not a distorted hand model. Current Biology. 34(10). 2238–2246.e5. 6 indexed citations
5.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2023). A Somatosensory Computation That Unifies Limbs and Tools. eNeuro. 10(11). ENEURO.0095–23.2023.
6.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2023). A horizon for haptic perception. Journal of Neurophysiology. 129(4). 793–798. 1 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2022). Reach planning with someone else's hand. Cortex. 153. 207–219. 9 indexed citations
8.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2021). A neural surveyor to map touch on the body. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(1). 9 indexed citations
9.
Miller, Luke E., Éric Koun, Roméo Salemme, et al.. (2019). Somatosensory Cortex Efficiently Processes Touch Located Beyond the Body. Current Biology. 29(24). 4276–4283.e5. 41 indexed citations
10.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2018). Patient Perception of Medication Communications in the Hospital. Journal of Healthcare Management. 63(2). 106–115. 4 indexed citations
11.
Miller, Luke E., Matthew R. Longo, & Ayşe Pınar Saygın. (2017). Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception. Cognition. 162. 32–40. 31 indexed citations
12.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2017). The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific. Experimental Brain Research. 235(10). 2917–2926. 27 indexed citations
13.
Sussman, A. J., et al.. (2015). UAS-Borne Photogrammetry for Surface Topographic Characterization: A Ground-Truth Baseline for Future Change Detection and Refinement of Scaled Remotely-Sensed Datasets. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2015. 1 indexed citations
14.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2014). The role of clinical decision support in pharmacist response to drug-interaction alerts. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 11(3). 480–486. 8 indexed citations
15.
Miller, Luke E., et al.. (2014). Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 982–982. 9 indexed citations
16.
Miller, Luke E., Matthew R. Longo, & Ayşe Pınar Saygın. (2014). Tool morphology constrains the effects of tool use on body representations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 40(6). 2143–2153. 87 indexed citations
17.
Miller, Luke E. & Ayşe Pınar Saygın. (2013). Individual differences in the perception of biological motion: Links to social cognition and motor imagery. Cognition. 128(2). 140–148. 86 indexed citations
18.
Kemmerer, David, Luke E. Miller, Megan K. MacPherson, Jessica E. Huber, & Daniel Tranel. (2013). An investigation of semantic similarity judgments about action and non-action verbs in Parkinson's disease: implications for the Embodied Cognition Framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. 146–146. 54 indexed citations
19.
Miller, Luke E. & A. P. Saygin. (2012). Intersubject variability in the use of form and motion cues during biological motion perception. Journal of Vision. 12(9). 460–460. 43 indexed citations
20.
Gielen, C.C.A.M., et al.. (1994). The relation between the direction dependence of electromyographic amplitude and motor unit recruitment thresholds during isometric contractions. Experimental Brain Research. 98(3). 488–500. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026