Luke Chamandy

808 total citations
29 papers, 569 citations indexed

About

Luke Chamandy is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke Chamandy has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 569 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Luke Chamandy's work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (18 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (18 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (14 papers). Luke Chamandy is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (18 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (18 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (14 papers). Luke Chamandy collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Luke Chamandy's co-authors include Eric G. Blackman, Anvar Shukurov, Kandaswamy Subramanian, Adam Frank, Jonathan Carroll-Nellenback, Jason Nordhaus, Baowei Liu, Ed Elson, R. Beck and Orsola De Marco and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters.

In The Last Decade

Luke Chamandy

26 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luke Chamandy United States 14 532 91 59 56 14 29 569
T. Nagao Japan 9 682 1.3× 77 0.8× 113 1.9× 37 0.7× 7 0.5× 23 698
M. J. Thompson United Kingdom 11 433 0.8× 28 0.3× 78 1.3× 45 0.8× 26 1.9× 36 451
Keith MacGregor United States 12 542 1.0× 29 0.3× 122 2.1× 59 1.1× 8 0.6× 32 555
J. Van Beeck Belgium 12 377 0.7× 53 0.6× 68 1.2× 25 0.4× 26 1.9× 17 391
J. W. den Hartogh Hungary 11 342 0.6× 76 0.8× 92 1.6× 15 0.3× 9 0.6× 14 364
М. Еселевич Russia 12 412 0.8× 34 0.4× 27 0.5× 134 2.4× 5 0.4× 85 431
Douglas Gough United Kingdom 6 233 0.4× 29 0.3× 24 0.4× 44 0.8× 22 1.6× 7 251
A. J. B. Russell United Kingdom 11 375 0.7× 29 0.3× 13 0.2× 114 2.0× 8 0.6× 29 402
M. Panchenko Austria 11 367 0.7× 30 0.3× 21 0.4× 58 1.0× 10 0.7× 41 384
K. Otmianowska‐Mazur Poland 15 598 1.1× 249 2.7× 50 0.8× 49 0.9× 8 0.6× 37 611

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Chamandy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Chamandy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Chamandy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Chamandy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Chamandy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Chamandy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Chamandy. The network helps show where Luke Chamandy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Chamandy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Chamandy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Chamandy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Chamandy. Luke Chamandy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chamandy, Luke, et al.. (2025). Understanding the drag torque in common envelope evolution. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 43. 1 indexed citations
2.
Chamandy, Luke, et al.. (2025). Second-generation planet formation after tidal disruption from common envelope evolution. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 42.
3.
Chamandy, Luke, et al.. (2025). Galactic Magnetic Fields. II. Applying the Model to Nearby Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. 988(2). 197–197.
4.
Chamandy, Luke, et al.. (2022). Jets from main sequence and white dwarf companions during common envelope evolution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 514(2). 3041–3057. 12 indexed citations
5.
Chamandy, Luke, et al.. (2021). Successive common envelope events from multiple planets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 502(1). L110–L114. 18 indexed citations
6.
Chamandy, Luke. (2020). . Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity). 10 indexed citations
7.
Reichardt, Thomas, Orsola De Marco, Roberto Iaconi, Luke Chamandy, & Daniel J. Price. (2020). The impact of recombination energy on simulations of the common-envelope binary interaction. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 494(4). 5333–5349. 42 indexed citations
8.
Frank, Adam, Thomas Reichardt, Orsola De Marco, et al.. (2020). Bipolar planetary nebulae from outflow collimation by common envelope evolution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 497(3). 2855–2869. 43 indexed citations
9.
Chamandy, Luke, Eric G. Blackman, Jonathan Carroll-Nellenback, et al.. (2019). Energy budget and core-envelope motion in common envelope evolution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 486(1). 1070–1085. 19 indexed citations
10.
Chamandy, Luke, et al.. (2019). How drag force evolves in global common envelope simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 490(3). 3727–3739. 25 indexed citations
11.
Chamandy, Luke & Nishant K. Singh. (2018). Non-linear galactic dynamos and the magnetic Rädler effect. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 481(1). 1300–1319. 8 indexed citations
12.
Chamandy, Luke, Adam Frank, Eric G. Blackman, et al.. (2018). Accretion in common envelope evolution. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 14(S343). 235–238. 1 indexed citations
13.
Chamandy, Luke, Adam Frank, Eric G. Blackman, et al.. (2018). Accretion in common envelope evolution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 480(2). 1898–1911. 85 indexed citations
14.
Blackman, Eric G., et al.. (2018). Derivation and precision of mean field electrodynamics with mesoscale fluctuations. Journal of Plasma Physics. 84(3). 9 indexed citations
15.
Chamandy, Luke & Nishant K. Singh. (2017). A new constraint on mean-field galactic dynamo theory. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 468(3). 3657–3662. 7 indexed citations
16.
Chamandy, Luke, Anvar Shukurov, & Kandaswamy Subramanian. (2014). Magnetic spiral arms and galactic outflows. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 446(1). L6–L10. 21 indexed citations
17.
Chamandy, Luke, Kandaswamy Subramanian, & Anvar Shukurov. (2013). Galactic spiral patterns and dynamo action – II. Asymptotic solutions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 433(4). 3274–3289. 20 indexed citations
18.
Chamandy, Luke, Kandaswamy Subramanian, & Alice C. Quillen. (2013). Magnetic arms generated by multiple interfering galactic spiral patterns. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 437(1). 562–574. 8 indexed citations
19.
Chamandy, Luke, Kandaswamy Subramanian, & Anvar Shukurov. (2012). Galactic spiral patterns and dynamo action. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 8(S294). 249–250. 2 indexed citations
20.
Chamandy, Luke, Kandaswamy Subramanian, & Anvar Shukurov. (2012). Galactic spiral patterns and dynamo action – I. A new twist on magnetic arms. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 428(4). 3569–3589. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026