Lucie Jones

754 total citations
10 papers, 510 citations indexed

About

Lucie Jones is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Lucie Jones has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 510 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Oncology, 5 papers in Cancer Research and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Lucie Jones's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). Lucie Jones is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). Lucie Jones collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Italy. Lucie Jones's co-authors include John P. Neoptolemos, Michelle J. Humphreys, Mark T. Boyd, Fiona Campbell, Paula Ghaneh, Fiona Campbell, Clare Roche, Mark L. Hughes, C.J. Garvey and Donagh White and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and American Journal of Roentgenology.

In The Last Decade

Lucie Jones

10 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lucie Jones United Kingdom 8 370 195 191 100 87 10 510
Le Xiao China 13 193 0.5× 68 0.3× 176 0.9× 198 2.0× 86 1.0× 29 529
Gro Linno Willemoe Denmark 11 249 0.7× 114 0.6× 80 0.4× 73 0.7× 58 0.7× 38 413
Eva Szentgyörgyi Canada 11 346 0.9× 155 0.8× 179 0.9× 290 2.9× 145 1.7× 28 693
Brunhilde Chaloupka Germany 13 282 0.8× 140 0.7× 103 0.5× 155 1.6× 26 0.3× 14 482
Renjie Yang China 16 129 0.3× 144 0.7× 202 1.1× 208 2.1× 124 1.4× 50 694
Warner Alpízar‐Alpízar Costa Rica 12 151 0.4× 132 0.7× 154 0.8× 85 0.8× 101 1.2× 26 407
Shinichi Tomisaki Japan 13 209 0.6× 135 0.7× 180 0.9× 141 1.4× 264 3.0× 20 542
H. Flesch France 9 248 0.7× 188 1.0× 144 0.8× 161 1.6× 103 1.2× 13 506
Kaija Vasala Finland 14 251 0.7× 120 0.6× 97 0.5× 92 0.9× 58 0.7× 27 483
Loreto Spencer Chile 13 239 0.6× 59 0.3× 117 0.6× 191 1.9× 138 1.6× 34 604

Countries citing papers authored by Lucie Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lucie Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucie Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucie Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lucie Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucie Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucie Jones. The network helps show where Lucie Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lucie Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lucie Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lucie Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lucie Jones. Lucie Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Henderson, Laura E., et al.. (2018). The Warwick Experience of the Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score® Assay as a Predictor of Chemotherapy Administration. Breast Care. 13(5). 369–372. 7 indexed citations
2.
Jafferbhoy, Sadaf, Rishikesh Parmeshwar, Sankaran Narayanan, et al.. (2017). Early multicentre experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon®. Gland Surgery. 6(6). 682–688. 43 indexed citations
3.
Tafazal, Habib, et al.. (2015). P103. The use of SentiMag in identifying the sentinel lymph node: Warwick experience. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 41(6). S55–S56. 1 indexed citations
4.
Athwal, Ruvinder, et al.. (2015). Patients' Perspective on Day Case Breast Surgery. Breast Care. 10(1). 39–43. 11 indexed citations
5.
Whisker, Lisa, et al.. (2012). Implementation of One Step Nucleic acid Amplification (OSNA) for Intra-operative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes in a DGH. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 38(5). 439–440. 1 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Lucie, Michelle J. Humphreys, Fiona Campbell, John P. Neoptolemos, & Mark T. Boyd. (2004). Comprehensive Analysis of Matrix Metalloproteinase and Tissue Inhibitor Expression in Pancreatic Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. 10(8). 2832–2845. 167 indexed citations
7.
Roche, Clare, Mark L. Hughes, C.J. Garvey, et al.. (2003). CT and Pathologic Assessment of Prospective Nodal Staging in Patients with Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Head of the Pancreas. American Journal of Roentgenology. 180(2). 475–480. 128 indexed citations
8.
Jones, Lucie, Franco Mosca, Ugo Boggi, et al.. (1999). Standard Kausch-Whipple Pancreatoduodenectomy. Digestive Surgery. 16(4). 297–304. 41 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Lucie, Paula Ghaneh, Michelle J. Humphreys, & John P. Neoptolemos. (1999). The Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 880(1). 288–307. 86 indexed citations
10.
Ghaneh, Paula, Anthony Kawesha, Nathan Howes, Lucie Jones, & John P. Neoptolemos. (1999). Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. World Journal of Surgery. 23(9). 937–945. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026