Louisette Mercier

671 total citations
8 papers, 545 citations indexed

About

Louisette Mercier is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Louisette Mercier has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 545 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Rehabilitation, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Louisette Mercier's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (4 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers). Louisette Mercier is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (4 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers). Louisette Mercier collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Louisette Mercier's co-authors include Johanne Desrosiers, Réjean Hébert, Gina Bravo, Élisabeth Dutil, Audrée Jeanne Beaudoin, Marie‐France Dubois, Annie Rochette, Bénédicte Fournier and Martin Prince and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Hand Therapy and Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Louisette Mercier

7 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Louisette Mercier Canada	5	349	202	173	111	108	8	545
J Lesley Crow Netherlands	9	389 1.1×	173 0.9×	221 1.3×	145 1.3×	99 0.9×	11	520
J Pélissier France	9	282 0.8×	139 0.7×	154 0.9×	109 1.0×	83 0.8×	14	447
Sandra B. Davis United States	10	418 1.2×	239 1.2×	192 1.1×	66 0.6×	104 1.0×	17	539
Phillip Carson United Kingdom	4	428 1.2×	205 1.0×	248 1.4×	154 1.4×	152 1.4×	9	599
Helen Atkinson United Kingdom	4	292 0.8×	203 1.0×	175 1.0×	83 0.7×	74 0.7×	5	444
Shanta Pandian India	14	486 1.4×	143 0.7×	209 1.2×	95 0.9×	91 0.8×	26	595
Bertrand Arsenault Canada	9	313 0.9×	252 1.2×	134 0.8×	91 0.8×	199 1.8×	9	634
C Eickhof Germany	7	465 1.3×	242 1.2×	353 2.0×	88 0.8×	91 0.8×	7	623
David Gasq France	14	267 0.8×	124 0.6×	129 0.7×	106 1.0×	142 1.3×	52	547
L. Oujamaa France	4	262 0.8×	102 0.5×	172 1.0×	103 0.9×	78 0.7×	9	413

Countries citing papers authored by Louisette Mercier

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Louisette Mercier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louisette Mercier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louisette Mercier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Louisette Mercier

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louisette Mercier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louisette Mercier. The network helps show where Louisette Mercier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louisette Mercier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louisette Mercier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louisette Mercier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louisette Mercier. Louisette Mercier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Prince, Martin, et al.. (2017). Persistent visual perceptual disorders after stroke: Associated factors. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 80(8). 479–485. 2 indexed citations

2.

Beaudoin, Audrée Jeanne, et al.. (2013). Visuoperceptual deficits and participation in older adults after stroke. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 60(4). 260–266. 26 indexed citations

3.

Mercier, Louisette, Johanne Desrosiers, Réjean Hébert, Annie Rochette, & Marie‐France Dubois. (2001). Normative Data for the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Vertical. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics. 19(2). 39–50. 21 indexed citations

4.

Mercier, Louisette, Johanne Desrosiers, Réjean Hébert, Annie Rochette, & Marie‐France Dubois. (2001). Normative Data for the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Vertical. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics. 19(2). 39–50. 1 indexed citations

5.

Desrosiers, Johanne, Louisette Mercier, & Annie Rochette. (1999). Fidélité test-retest et interjuges de la version française du OSOT Perceptual Evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 66(3). 134–139.

6.

Desrosiers, Johanne, Gina Bravo, Réjean Hébert, & Louisette Mercier. (1995). Impact of Elbow Position on Grip Strength of Elderly Men. Journal of Hand Therapy. 8(1). 27–30. 38 indexed citations

7.

Desrosiers, Johanne, Réjean Hébert, Élisabeth Dutil, Gina Bravo, & Louisette Mercier. (1994). Validity of the TEMPA: A Measurement Instrument for Upper Extremity Performance. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. 14(4). 267–281. 40 indexed citations

8.

Desrosiers, Johanne, Gina Bravo, Réjean Hébert, Élisabeth Dutil, & Louisette Mercier. (1994). Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 75(7). 751–755. 417 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact