Louise W. Staley

512 total citations
8 papers, 398 citations indexed

About

Louise W. Staley is a scholar working on Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Louise W. Staley has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 398 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Louise W. Staley's work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (7 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers). Louise W. Staley is often cited by papers focused on Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (7 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers). Louise W. Staley collaborates with scholars based in United States and India. Louise W. Staley's co-authors include Annette K. Taylor, Randi J. Hagerman, Claire Hull, David L. Nelson, David R. Nelson, Scott McLean, C. Thomas Caskey, Michèle M. M. Mazzocco, Karen Snow and Stephen N. Thibodeau and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, The American Journal of Human Genetics and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Louise W. Staley

8 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Louise W. Staley United States 6 369 283 210 19 19 8 398
Serieta Mohkamsing Netherlands 9 639 1.7× 458 1.6× 347 1.7× 23 1.2× 37 1.9× 11 686
Moyra Smith United States 3 225 0.6× 236 0.8× 120 0.6× 23 1.2× 32 1.7× 5 401
Isabel Tejada Spain 6 359 1.0× 223 0.8× 248 1.2× 47 2.5× 14 0.7× 9 414
Gabriele Schmötzer Germany 7 252 0.7× 220 0.8× 171 0.8× 20 1.1× 75 3.9× 7 408
Jeannette E. Riddle United States 7 425 1.2× 347 1.2× 206 1.0× 18 0.9× 36 1.9× 9 448
Tasleem Chechi United States 5 222 0.6× 190 0.7× 137 0.7× 24 1.3× 13 0.7× 11 301
Kali Witherspoon United States 2 446 1.2× 279 1.0× 283 1.3× 35 1.8× 11 0.6× 2 568
William M. Brandler United Kingdom 8 232 0.6× 303 1.1× 102 0.5× 12 0.6× 13 0.7× 8 494
Kiana Mohajeri United States 5 404 1.1× 215 0.8× 274 1.3× 19 1.0× 9 0.5× 6 549
Jean-Louis Mandel France 3 588 1.6× 291 1.0× 481 2.3× 48 2.5× 10 0.5× 4 660

Countries citing papers authored by Louise W. Staley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Louise W. Staley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise W. Staley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise W. Staley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Louise W. Staley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise W. Staley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise W. Staley. The network helps show where Louise W. Staley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louise W. Staley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louise W. Staley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louise W. Staley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louise W. Staley. Louise W. Staley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Hagerman, Randi J., et al.. (1996). Learning-disabled Males With a Fragile X CGG Expansion in the Upper Premutation Size Range. PEDIATRICS. 97(1). 122–126. 95 indexed citations
2.
Staley, Louise W., et al.. (1995). Identification of cytogenetic abnormalities as a consequence of FMR-1 testing in schools. 8. 310–318. 2 indexed citations
3.
McConkie‐Rosell, Allyn, Hazel M. Robinson, Shannon Wake, et al.. (1995). Dissemination of genetic risk information to relatives in the fragile X syndrome: Guidelines for genetic counselors. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 59(4). 426–430. 22 indexed citations
4.
Hagerman, Randi J., Claire Hull, Louise W. Staley, et al.. (1994). High functioning fragile X males: Demonstration of an unmethylated fully expanded FMR‐1 mutation associated with protein expression. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 51(4). 298–308. 176 indexed citations
5.
Hagerman, Randi J., Rory J O’Connor, & Louise W. Staley. (1994). Mild clinical involvement in two males with a large FMR1 premutation. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 55. 1 indexed citations
6.
Hagerman, Randi J., Philip Wilson, Louise W. Staley, et al.. (1994). Evaluation of school children at high risk for fragile X syndrome utilizing buccal cell FMR‐1 testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 51(4). 474–481. 46 indexed citations
7.
Sobesky, William E., Louise W. Staley, Elizabeth Berry‐Kravis, et al.. (1994). Fragile X Syndrome in a Normal IQ Male with Learning and Emotional Problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 33(9). 1316–1321. 32 indexed citations
8.
Staley, Louise W.. (1993). Molecular-Clinical Correlations in Children and Adults With Fragile X Syndrome. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 147(7). 723–723. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026