Louis J. Ling
- Emergency Medicine top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Stephen W. SmithCharles E. HalstensonDouglas J. BorysEdward P. KrenzelokErnest S StremskiDeborah L. AndersonDaniel F. DanzlWilliam G. Barsan
- Topics
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies (15 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers)Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Emergency MedicineAcademic Emergency MedicineThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Louis J. Ling
36 papers receiving 574 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Emergency Medicine 260
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 126
- Psychiatry and Mental health 92
- General Health Professions 79
- Pharmacology 78
Countries citing papers authored by Louis J. Ling
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis J. Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis J. Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis J. Ling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louis J. Ling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis J. Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis J. Ling. The network helps show where Louis J. Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis J. Ling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis J. Ling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis J. Ling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louis J. Ling. Louis J. Ling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 79 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 84 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Louis J. Ling
Louis J. Ling is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Family Practice and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (15 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (260 citations), Family Practice (32 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (48 citations). Louis J. Ling has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen W. Smith, Charles E. Halstenson, Douglas J. Borys, Edward P. Krenzelok, Ernest S Stremski, Deborah L. Anderson, Daniel F. Danzl, William G. Barsan, Robert H. Bartlett and Donna Seger. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Emergency Medicine, Academic Emergency Medicine and The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.