Loretta Ford

25 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Loretta Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Toxicology 145
  • Speech and Hearing 47
  • Transplantation 17
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 183
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 98
Replace Stephen R. Morley with:
Stephen R. Morley United Kingdom
Chi Chung Shek China
Denyse Thornley‐Brown United States
Vanessa Shaw United Kingdom
Zul Verjee Canada
Bernardino Barceló Martín Spain
Apichaya Puangpetch Thailand
Alan K. Kamada United States
Corine Ekhart Netherlands
Giuseppe Cicala Italy
Loretta Ford relative to Stephen R. Morley United Kingdom Stephen R. Morley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Stephen R. Morley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Loretta Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Loretta Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loretta Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loretta Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Loretta Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loretta Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loretta Ford. The network helps show where Loretta Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Loretta Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Loretta Ford Line = papers co-authored together Loretta Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201088
2 200663
3 201853
4 200640
5 200834
6 201628
7 200628
8 202423
9 200422
10 200919
11 200816
12 200415
13 201615
14 200812
15 201610
16 20139
17 20179
18 20168
19 20167
20 20177

About Loretta Ford

Loretta Ford is a scholar working on Toxicology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (9 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (7 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers) and Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (145 citations), Speech and Hearing (47 citations), Transplantation (17 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (183 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (98 citations). Loretta Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. M. Berg, Sheldon C. Cooper, Matthew Lewis, Paul Morris, Graham McIlroy, Dairena Gaffney, Allister Vale, J Allister Vale, Sally Bradberry and Rousseau Gama. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Toxicology, Journal of Clinical Pathology, Pharmacogenomics and BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact