Long Luo

20 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Long Luo
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 70
  • Catalysis 76
  • Materials Chemistry 262
  • Mechanical Engineering 120
  • Biomaterials 40
Replace Ricardo Mendes Leal Neto with:
Ricardo Mendes Leal Neto Brazil
Julien O. Fadonougbo South Korea
Mikhail S. Bocharnikov Russia
Bernard Tougas Canada
Wenchao Cao China
Yevgeniy Klochko South Africa
Kateryna Peinecke Germany
Renato Belli Strozi Brazil
Changjun Cheng Canada
Hailong Shen China
Long Luo relative to Ricardo Mendes Leal Neto Brazil Ricardo Mendes Leal Neto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Ricardo Mendes Leal Neto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Long Luo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Long Luo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Long Luo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Long Luo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Long Luo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Long Luo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Long Luo. The network helps show where Long Luo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Long Luo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Long Luo Line = papers co-authored together Long Luo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202381
2 201933
3 201725
4 202224
5 202123
6 202222
7 201920
8 202412
9 202311
10 201911
11 201911
12 202410
13 20229
14 20198
15 20234
16 20194
17 20134
18 20232
19 20242
20 20241

About Long Luo

Long Luo is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Catalysis and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrogen Storage and Materials (16 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (8 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (7 papers), Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction (5 papers), High Entropy Alloys Studies (5 papers), High-Temperature Coating Behaviors (3 papers), Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (3 papers) and Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Energy Engineering and Power Technology (70 citations), Catalysis (76 citations), Materials Chemistry (262 citations), Mechanical Engineering (120 citations) and Biomaterials (40 citations). Long Luo has collaborated with scholars based in China, New Zealand and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Yongzhi Li, Yiming Li, Tingting Zhai, Suxia Liu, Zengwu Zhao, Yanghuan Zhang, Lirong Li, Zeming Yuan, Junjie Cui and Linfeng Li. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, Materials & Design, Journal of Alloys and Compounds and Catalysis Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact