Liu Wang-jin

709 total citations
7 papers, 504 citations indexed

About

Liu Wang-jin is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Liu Wang-jin has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 504 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 6 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Liu Wang-jin's work include Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers). Liu Wang-jin is often cited by papers focused on Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers). Liu Wang-jin collaborates with scholars based in China. Liu Wang-jin's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Information Sciences and Fuzzy Sets and Systems.

In The Last Decade

Liu Wang-jin

7 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Liu Wang-jin

MSOR

CTM

AI

ANT

GT

Naseem Ajmal India

Young-Bae Jun South Korea

S.K. Bhakat India

Y JUN South Korea

V. Murali South Africa

Jinming Fang China

Michael Tsingelis Greece

Constantine Tsinakis United States

S. Yamak Türkiye

U. M. Swamy India

Naseem Ajmal India

Liu Wang-jin

524 ×1.1

MSOR

413 ×1.0

CTM

182 ×0.8

AI

80 ×1.4

ANT

89 ×1.6

GT

Citations per year, relative to Liu Wang-jin Liu Wang-jin (= 1×) peers Naseem Ajmal

Countries citing papers authored by Liu Wang-jin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liu Wang-jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liu Wang-jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liu Wang-jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liu Wang-jin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liu Wang-jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liu Wang-jin. The network helps show where Liu Wang-jin may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Wang-jin, Liu. (1990). Fuzzy prime ideals and fuzzy radical ideals. Information Sciences. 50(2). 111–122. 6 indexed citations

2.

Wang-jin, Liu. (1990). On some systems of simultaneous equations in a completely distributive lattice. Information Sciences. 50(2). 185–196. 6 indexed citations

3.

Wang-jin, Liu. (1989). Uniformity and proximity of L-fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 30(1). 37–45. 6 indexed citations

4.

Wang-jin, Liu, et al.. (1985). Singular homology groups of fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 15(2). 199–207. 3 indexed citations

5.

Wang-jin, Liu. (1985). Fuzzy proximity spaces redefined. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 15(3). 241–248. 17 indexed citations

6.

Wang-jin, Liu. (1983). Operations on fuzzy ideals. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 11(1-3). 31–39. 87 indexed citations

7.

Wang-jin, Liu. (1982). Fuzzy invariant subgroups and fuzzy ideals. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 8(2). 133–139. 379 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact