Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A SOLUBLE RIBONUCLEIC ACID INTERMEDIATE IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
1958631 citationsMahlon B. Hoagland, Mary L. Stephenson et al.Journal of Biological Chemistryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Liselotte I. Hecht
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Liselotte I. Hecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liselotte I. Hecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liselotte I. Hecht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liselotte I. Hecht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liselotte I. Hecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liselotte I. Hecht. The network helps show where Liselotte I. Hecht may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liselotte I. Hecht
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liselotte I. Hecht.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liselotte I. Hecht based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Liselotte I. Hecht. Liselotte I. Hecht is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zamecnik, Paul C., Mary L. Stephenson, & Liselotte I. Hecht. (1958). Intermediate Reactions in Amino Acid Incorporation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 44(2). 73–78.41 indexed citations
6.
Hoagland, Mahlon B., Mary L. Stephenson, Jesse F. Scott, Liselotte I. Hecht, & Paul C. Zamecnik. (1958). A SOLUBLE RIBONUCLEIC ACID INTERMEDIATE IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 231(1). 241–257.631 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Hecht, Liselotte I. & Van R. Potter. (1958). Nucleic acid metabolism in regenerating rat liver. V. Comparison of results in vivo and in tissue slices.. PubMed. 18(2). 186–92.35 indexed citations
Herbert, Edward, Van R. Potter, & Liselotte I. Hecht. (1957). NUCLEOTIDE METABOLISM. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 225(2). 659–674.49 indexed citations
10.
Hecht, Liselotte I. & Van R. Potter. (1956). Nucleic Acid Metabolism in Regenerating Rat Liver. Cancer Research. 16(2). 186–192.29 indexed citations
Hecht, Liselotte I. & Van R. Potter. (1956). Nucleic acid metabolism in regenerating rat liver. III. Intermediates in the synthesis of DNA pyrimidine nucleotides.. PubMed. 16(10 Part 1). 999–1004.38 indexed citations
13.
Hecht, Liselotte I. & Van R. Potter. (1956). Nucleic acid metabolism in regenerating rat liver. I. The rate of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in vivo.. PubMed. 16(10 Part 1). 988–93.141 indexed citations
Novikoff, Alex B., et al.. (1952). PHOSPHATASES OF RAT LIVER. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 194(1). 153–170.98 indexed citations
17.
Schmidt, Gerhard, et al.. (1951). ON THE ACTION OF RIBONUCLEASE. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 192(2). 715–726.74 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.