Lisa Ringhofer

453 total citations
8 papers, 312 citations indexed

About

Lisa Ringhofer is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa Ringhofer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 312 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Lisa Ringhofer's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (2 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers). Lisa Ringhofer is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (2 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers). Lisa Ringhofer collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Austria and Ireland. Lisa Ringhofer's co-authors include Simron Jit Singh, Nelson Grima, Barbara Smetschka, Marina Fischer‐Kowalski, Clemens M. Grünbühel, Christian Lauk and Panos Petridis and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecosystem Services, Development in Practice and Progress in Development Studies.

In The Last Decade

Lisa Ringhofer

8 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lisa Ringhofer Canada	7	193	119	75	41	24	8	312
Erlend Dancke Sandorf Norway	12	76 0.4×	201 1.7×	77 1.0×	37 0.9×	42 1.8×	27	312
Paige Olmsted Canada	6	239 1.2×	115 1.0×	136 1.8×	76 1.9×	64 2.7×	8	442
Kelly A. Grogan United States	11	98 0.5×	106 0.9×	27 0.4×	32 0.8×	23 1.0×	48	372
Frito Dolisca United States	5	195 1.0×	83 0.7×	61 0.8×	44 1.1×	32 1.3×	6	349
Kalpana Giri Austria	9	244 1.3×	74 0.6×	70 0.9×	47 1.1×	32 1.3×	11	356
Nelson Turyahabwe Uganda	11	207 1.1×	55 0.5×	87 1.2×	20 0.5×	92 3.8×	31	386
Brooks Depro United States	7	110 0.6×	110 0.9×	18 0.2×	77 1.9×	21 0.9×	16	302
Fiona Flintan United Kingdom	8	138 0.7×	45 0.4×	76 1.0×	77 1.9×	40 1.7×	27	273
Eliot Levine United States	7	106 0.5×	53 0.4×	37 0.5×	35 0.9×	48 2.0×	13	301
Cristina Marta-Pedroso Portugal	8	204 1.1×	151 1.3×	62 0.8×	55 1.3×	51 2.1×	13	383

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Ringhofer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Ringhofer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Ringhofer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Ringhofer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Ringhofer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Ringhofer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Ringhofer. The network helps show where Lisa Ringhofer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Ringhofer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Ringhofer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Ringhofer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Ringhofer. Lisa Ringhofer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Ringhofer, Lisa, et al.. (2019). Has the Theory of Change established itself as the better alternative to the Logical Framework Approach in development cooperation programmes?. Progress in Development Studies. 19(2). 112–122. 10 indexed citations

2.

Grima, Nelson, Lisa Ringhofer, Simron Jit Singh, Barbara Smetschka, & Christian Lauk. (2017). Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Development Practice: Can the Concept of PES Deliver?. Progress in Development Studies. 17(4). 267–281. 1 indexed citations

3.

Singh, Simron Jit, et al.. (2016). Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE) in Theory and Practice: Introducing the software OPTamos. 6 indexed citations

4.

Ringhofer, Lisa. (2015). Time, labour, and the household: measuring “time poverty” through a gender lens. Development in Practice. 25(3). 321–332. 7 indexed citations

5.

Grima, Nelson, Simron Jit Singh, Barbara Smetschka, & Lisa Ringhofer. (2015). Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosystem Services. 17. 24–32. 213 indexed citations

6.

Fischer‐Kowalski, Marina, et al.. (2011). Sociometabolic transitions in subsistence communities: Boserup revisited in four comparative case studies. 13 indexed citations

7.

Ringhofer, Lisa. (2009). Fishing, Foraging and Farming in the Bolivian Amazon. 24 indexed citations

8.

Ringhofer, Lisa. (2009). Fishing, Foraging and Farming in the Bolivian Amazon: On a Local Society in Transition. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact