Lisa McWilliams

730 citations
10 papers · 188 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Lisa McWilliams

10 papers receiving 181 citations

Peers

Lisa McWilliams
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Molecular Medicine 45
  • Biophysics 21
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 32
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 29
  • Molecular Biology 101
Replace Shreyas Kaptan with:
Shreyas Kaptan Germany
Teresa Páramo United Kingdom
Anh Miu Canada
Qinghua Luo China
Jessica Binder United States
Zeyu Zhu United States
Luise Eckhardt-Strelau Germany
Jeremy R. Hershfield United States
Thomas D. Newport United Kingdom
Akshay Subramanian Switzerland
Lisa McWilliams relative to Shreyas Kaptan Germany Shreyas Kaptan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Shreyas Kaptan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa McWilliams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa McWilliams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa McWilliams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa McWilliams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa McWilliams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa McWilliams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa McWilliams. The network helps show where Lisa McWilliams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisa McWilliams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa McWilliams Line = papers co-authored together Lisa McWilliams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201590
2 201632
3 201730
4 201714
5 20227
6 20215
7 20164
8 20153
9 20222
10 20181

About Lisa McWilliams

Lisa McWilliams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Biophysics, Oncology and Small Animals, having authored 10 papers that have together received 188 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cell Image Analysis Techniques (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (1 paper), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (1 paper), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1 paper) and Animal testing and alternatives (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (45 citations), Biophysics (21 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (32 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (29 citations) and Molecular Biology (101 citations). Lisa McWilliams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Asha S. Nayar, Sarah M. McLeod, Thomas J. Dougherty, Hajime Tokuda, Lindsey Leach, Alita A. Miller, Dean G. Brown, Keith Ferguson, Shin‐ichiro Narita and David C. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as SLAS DISCOVERY, Assay and Drug Development Technologies, Journal of Bacteriology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Neuro-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact