Lin‐Yee Hin

1.0k total citations
29 papers, 788 citations indexed

About

Lin‐Yee Hin is a scholar working on Finance, Statistics and Probability and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lin‐Yee Hin has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 788 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Finance, 6 papers in Statistics and Probability and 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Lin‐Yee Hin's work include Stochastic processes and financial applications (8 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (4 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers). Lin‐Yee Hin is often cited by papers focused on Stochastic processes and financial applications (8 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (4 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers). Lin‐Yee Hin collaborates with scholars based in China, Australia and Hong Kong. Lin‐Yee Hin's co-authors include You‐Gan Wang, Tony K.H. Chung, Geoffrey Brieger, Shing‐Kai Yip, Matthias R. Fengler, Vincent J. Carey, Tze Kin Lau, Kwok Wai Lo, Wan Yee Lau and Choong Tsek Liew and has published in prestigious journals such as Oncogene, International Journal of Cancer and Journal of Econometrics.

In The Last Decade

Lin‐Yee Hin

26 papers receiving 757 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lin‐Yee Hin China	14	225	192	154	142	131	29	788
Jeremy Gaskins United States	13	98 0.4×	140 0.7×	47 0.3×	83 0.6×	129 1.0×	117	659
Amar Ahmad United Kingdom	17	41 0.2×	201 1.0×	11 0.1×	312 2.2×	450 3.4×	50	1.3k
Mohamed Jalloh Senegal	15	72 0.3×	47 0.2×	51 0.3×	106 0.7×	185 1.4×	85	778
Piret Veerus Estonia	15	29 0.1×	284 1.5×	18 0.1×	30 0.2×	361 2.8×	57	758
Alan Paciorek United States	13	43 0.2×	96 0.5×	10 0.1×	43 0.3×	239 1.8×	45	594
Cristiane Murta‐Nascimento Spain	16	21 0.1×	106 0.6×	46 0.3×	425 3.0×	540 4.1×	39	1.4k
Earl Duncan Australia	8	178 0.8×	50 0.3×	31 0.2×	18 0.1×	41 0.3×	18	611
Saiful Miah United Kingdom	18	148 0.7×	20 0.1×	71 0.5×	417 2.9×	167 1.3×	45	1.2k
MW Beckmann Germany	18	20 0.1×	76 0.4×	19 0.1×	156 1.1×	272 2.1×	133	1.1k
Erik Skaaheim Haug Norway	16	71 0.3×	35 0.2×	26 0.2×	130 0.9×	163 1.2×	54	762

Countries citing papers authored by Lin‐Yee Hin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lin‐Yee Hin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lin‐Yee Hin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lin‐Yee Hin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lin‐Yee Hin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lin‐Yee Hin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lin‐Yee Hin. The network helps show where Lin‐Yee Hin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lin‐Yee Hin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lin‐Yee Hin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lin‐Yee Hin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lin‐Yee Hin. Lin‐Yee Hin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kordzakhia, Nino, Yury A. Kutoyants, Alexander Novikov, & Lin‐Yee Hin. (2018). On limit distributions of estimators in irregular statistical models and a new representation of fractional Brownian motion. Statistics & Probability Letters. 139. 141–151. 2 indexed citations

Hin, Lin‐Yee & Nikolai Dokuchaev. (2015). Computation of the implied discount rate and volatility for an overdefined system using stochastic optimization. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics. 27(4). 505–527. 3 indexed citations

Hin, Lin‐Yee & Nikolai Dokuchaev. (2014). An Analysis of Volatility Spread via the Risk-Free Rate Proxy. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Hin, Lin‐Yee & Nikolai Dokuchaev. (2013). On the Implied Volatility Layers Under the Future Risk-Free Rate Uncertainty. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Hin, Lin‐Yee & You‐Gan Wang. (2008). Working‐correlation‐structure identification in generalized estimating equations. Statistics in Medicine. 28(4). 642–658. 115 indexed citations

Hin, Lin‐Yee, Vincent J. Carey, & You‐Gan Wang. (2007). Criteria for Working–Correlation–Structure Selection in GEE. The American Statistician. 61(4). 360–364. 46 indexed citations

Yeo, Winnie, W. H. Kwan, P. Teo, et al.. (2003). Psychosocial impact of breast cancer surgeries in chinese patients and their spouses. Psycho-Oncology. 13(2). 132–139. 46 indexed citations

Roach, Vijay, et al.. (2000). THE INCIDENCE OF PREGNANCY-INDUCED HYPERTENSION AMONG PATIENTS WITH CARBOHYDRATE INTOLERANCE. Hypertension in Pregnancy. 19(2). 183–189. 14 indexed citations

Chung, David C., et al.. (1999). A bougie improves the utility of the UpsherScope™. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 11(6). 471–476. 1 indexed citations

10.

Hin, Lin‐Yee, et al.. (1999). Pregnancy-induced hypertension and placenta previa: a racial and geographical perspective. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 67(3). 177–178. 1 indexed citations

11.

Liew, Choong Tsek, Kwok Wai Lo, Chon Kar Leow, et al.. (1999). High frequency of p16INK4A gene alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 18(3). 789–795. 151 indexed citations

12.

Hin, Lin‐Yee, Tze Kin Lau, Michael S. Rogers, & Allan Chang. (1999). Dichotomization of continuous measurements using generalized additive modelling - application in predicting intrapartum Caesarean delivery. Statistics in Medicine. 18(9). 1101–1110. 35 indexed citations

13.

Liew, Choong Tsek, Kwok Wai Lo, Chon Kar Leow, et al.. (1999). Frequent allelic loss on chromosome 9 in hepatocellular carcinoma. International Journal of Cancer. 81(3). 319–324. 33 indexed citations

14.

Yip, Shing‐Kai, Lin‐Yee Hin, & Tony K.H. Chung. (1998). Effect of the Duration of Labor on Postpartum Postvoid Residual Bladder Volume. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 45(3). 177–180. 22 indexed citations

15.

Brieger, Geoffrey, M. Mongelli, Lin‐Yee Hin, & Tony K.H. Chung. (1997). The epidemiology of urinary dysfunction in Chinese women. International Urogynecology Journal. 8(4). 191–195. 21 indexed citations

16.

Yip, Shing‐Kai, Geoffrey Brieger, Lin‐Yee Hin, & Tony K.H. Chung. (1997). Urinary retention in the post‐partum period: The relationship between obstetric factors and the post‐partum post‐void residual bladder volume. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 76(7). 667–672. 123 indexed citations

17.

Hin, Lin‐Yee, et al.. (1997). Antepartum and intrapartum prediction of cesarean need: Risk scoring in singleton pregnancies. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 90(2). 183–186. 25 indexed citations

18.

Brieger, Geoffrey, et al.. (1996). The prevalence of urinary dysfunction in Hong Kong Chinese women. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 88(6). 1041–1044. 63 indexed citations

19.

Hin, Lin‐Yee, et al.. (1996). Expert systems in perinatal medicine. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 6(4). 189–193.

20.

Hin, Lin‐Yee, et al.. (1994). The Predictive Value of Extremes of Birth Weight, Mother's Height and Ethnic Origin on the Likelihood of Emergency Caesarean Section. Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 20(4). 389–394. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact