Line Melby

55 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Line Melby
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 25
  • Health Information Management 73
  • General Health Professions 252
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 30
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
Replace Linda A Treiber with:
Linda A Treiber United States
Johanna Lammintakanen Finland
Aud Obstfelder Norway
Elizabeth Hart United Kingdom
Judy Birdsell Canada
Ruud ter Meulen United Kingdom
Martina A. Clarke United States
Sue S. Feldman United States
Tuula Kivinen Finland
Karen Davies United States
Line Melby relative to Linda A Treiber United States Linda A Treiber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Linda A Treiber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Line Melby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Line Melby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Line Melby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Line Melby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Line Melby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Line Melby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Line Melby. The network helps show where Line Melby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Line Melby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Line Melby Line = papers co-authored together Line Melby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201859
2 196741
3 201540
4 201939
5 201433
6 201721
7 201721
8 201320
9 201319
10 201818
11 201917
12 201017
13 201117
14 201916
15 202212
16 201511
17 202111
18 201510
19 202110
20 20119

About Line Melby

Line Melby is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (14 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (8 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (25 citations), Health Information Management (73 citations), General Health Professions (252 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (30 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations). Line Melby has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Denmark and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Ragnhild Hellesø, Donald R. Strobach, Aud Obstfelder, Pieter J. Toussaint, Anders Grimsmo, Sissel Steihaug, Veronika Paulsen, Bård Paulsen, Morten Hertzum and Marian Ådnanes. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Integrated Care, International Journal of Medical Informatics, BMC Health Services Research, Health Expectations and European Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact