Linda Schultz

1.2k total citations
13 papers, 687 citations indexed

About

Linda Schultz is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda Schultz has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 687 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Linda Schultz's work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers). Linda Schultz is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers). Linda Schultz collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Linda Schultz's co-authors include Joanne M. Garrett, Michael H. Monroe, Nancy Phifer, Sam Cykert, Charles D. MacLean, Beth Susi, John W. McDonald, George E. Rottinghaus, Cristina Sadowsky and John A. Jane and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Crop Science and Surgical Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

Linda Schultz

12 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Linda Schultz
Miho Asano Canada
Caroline Wilson United States
Shin Ah Kim South Korea
Arthur Watts United States
R. D. Sweet United Kingdom
Linda Schultz
Citations per year, relative to Linda Schultz Linda Schultz (= 1×) peers Troels Steenstrup

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Schultz. The network helps show where Linda Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Schultz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Schultz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Schultz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Schultz. Linda Schultz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Talamini, Mark A., et al.. (2021). Thriving or surviving? A critical examination of funding models for fellowship council fellowships. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(4). 2607–2613.
2.
Feldman, Liane S., Aurora D. Pryor, Aimee K. Gardner, et al.. (2020). SAGES Video-Based Assessment (VBA) program: a vision for life-long learning for surgeons. Surgical Endoscopy. 34(8). 3285–3288. 29 indexed citations
3.
Stefanidis, Dimitrios, Linda Schultz, Patricia Sylla, et al.. (2020). SAGES masters program: determining the seminal articles for each pathway. Surgical Endoscopy. 34(4). 1465–1481. 3 indexed citations
4.
Ritter, E. Matthew, Aimee K. Gardner, Brian J. Dunkin, et al.. (2019). Video-based assessment for laparoscopic fundoplication: initial development of a robust tool for operative performance assessment. Surgical Endoscopy. 34(7). 3176–3183. 22 indexed citations
5.
Goldblatt, Matthew I., et al.. (2019). SAGES Advanced GI/MIS fellowship redesign: pilot results and adoption of new standards. Surgical Endoscopy. 33(9). 3056–3061. 4 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Daniel B., Dimitrios Stefanidis, James R. Korndorffer, et al.. (2017). SAGES University MASTERS Program: a structured curriculum for deliberate, lifelong learning. Surgical Endoscopy. 31(8). 3061–3071. 26 indexed citations
7.
MacLean, Charles D., Beth Susi, Nancy Phifer, et al.. (2003). Patient preference for physician discussion and practice of spirituality. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 18(1). 38–43. 202 indexed citations
8.
Monroe, Michael H., Beth Susi, Nancy Phifer, et al.. (2003). Primary Care Physician Preferences Regarding Spiritual Behavior in Medical Practice. Archives of Internal Medicine. 163(22). 2751–2751. 117 indexed citations
9.
McDonald, John W., Daniel Becker, Cristina Sadowsky, et al.. (2002). Late recovery following spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. 97(2). 252–265. 127 indexed citations
10.
Sadowsky, Cristina, et al.. (2002). Spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation. 24(13). 680–687. 33 indexed citations
11.
Brady, Donald, Linda Schultz, Nathan O. Spell, & William T. Branch. (2002). Iterative Method for Learning Skills as an Efficient Outpatient Teacher. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 323(3). 124–129. 8 indexed citations
12.
Hill, N. S., et al.. (1993). Simplified Sample Preparation for HPLC Analysis of Ergovaline in Tall Fescue. Crop Science. 33(2). 331–333. 62 indexed citations
13.
Rottinghaus, George E., et al.. (1993). An HPLC Method for the Detection of Ergot in Ground and Pelleted Feeds. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 5(2). 242–247. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026