Linda Potter

605 total citations
9 papers, 450 citations indexed

About

Linda Potter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda Potter has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 450 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Oncology and 4 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Linda Potter's work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (4 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers). Linda Potter is often cited by papers focused on Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (4 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers). Linda Potter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Linda Potter's co-authors include James H. Pringle, Gerald Saldanha, Alan Fletcher, Peter J. Hutchinson, Qiang Huang, I Lauder, John Keyte, Lindsay Primrose, Pauline Close and Edward J. Hollox and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Clinical Cancer Research and International Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Linda Potter

9 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Linda Potter United Kingdom	7	350	220	81	55	53	9	450
Anette Birck Denmark	5	500 1.4×	208 0.9×	63 0.8×	63 1.1×	92 1.7×	7	573
Montserrat Arumí-Uría Spain	9	252 0.7×	235 1.1×	101 1.2×	135 2.5×	29 0.5×	13	498
Janet L. Maldonado United States	5	488 1.4×	438 2.0×	87 1.1×	108 2.0×	99 1.9×	6	714
Javier Rangel United States	9	348 1.0×	199 0.9×	61 0.8×	23 0.4×	67 1.3×	14	478
William Rickaby United Kingdom	5	419 1.2×	454 2.1×	167 2.1×	97 1.8×	106 2.0×	14	702
Rita G Ladstein Norway	8	192 0.5×	219 1.0×	60 0.7×	37 0.7×	72 1.4×	8	345
Judith Symmons Australia	7	244 0.7×	174 0.8×	126 1.6×	53 1.0×	105 2.0×	9	416
Kenji Nakamaru Japan	10	296 0.8×	217 1.0×	75 0.9×	42 0.8×	18 0.3×	23	512
Richard Yu United States	4	237 0.7×	177 0.8×	95 1.2×	54 1.0×	86 1.6×	6	365
Tetsuya Otsuki Japan	11	383 1.1×	155 0.7×	76 0.9×	54 1.0×	56 1.1×	24	561

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Potter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Potter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Potter. The network helps show where Linda Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Potter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Potter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Potter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Potter. Linda Potter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Saldanha, Gerald, et al.. (2016). MicroRNA-21 expression and its pathogenetic significance in cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Research. 26(1). 21–28. 18 indexed citations

2.

Moore, David A., et al.. (2015). Duplex Ratio Tests as Diagnostic Biomarkers in Malignant Melanoma. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 17(5). 616–622. 2 indexed citations

3.

Moore, David A., et al.. (2013). Accurate Detection of Copy Number Changes in DNA Extracted from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Melanoma Tissue Using Duplex Ratio Tests. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 15(5). 687–694. 8 indexed citations

4.

Saldanha, Gerald, et al.. (2011). Detection of Copy Number Changes in DNA from Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues Using Paralogue Ratio Tests. Analytical Chemistry. 83(9). 3484–3492. 7 indexed citations

5.

Pringle, James H., Peter J. Hutchinson, Qiang Huang, et al.. (2008). WNT5A Expression Increases during Melanoma Progression and Correlates with Outcome. Clinical Cancer Research. 14(18). 5825–5832. 140 indexed citations

6.

Saldanha, Gerald, et al.. (2006). Cutaneous Melanoma Subtypes Show Different BRAF and NRAS Mutation Frequencies. Clinical Cancer Research. 12(15). 4499–4505. 88 indexed citations

7.

Saldanha, Gerald, et al.. (2004). High BRAF mutation frequency does not characterize all melanocytic tumor types. International Journal of Cancer. 111(5). 705–710. 113 indexed citations

8.

Kendall, C H, Linda Potter, Richard C. D. Brown, et al.. (1993). In situ correlation of synthesis and storage of parathormone in parathyroid gland disease. The Journal of Pathology. 169(1). 61–66. 6 indexed citations

9.

Pringle, James H., Lindsay Primrose, John Keyte, et al.. (1990). In situ hybridization of immunoglobulin light chain mRNA in paraffin sections using biotinylated or hapten‐labelled oligonucleotide probes. The Journal of Pathology. 162(3). 197–207. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact