Linda G. Canton

1.4k total citations
17 papers, 813 citations indexed

About

Linda G. Canton is a scholar working on Surgery, Internal Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda G. Canton has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 813 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Internal Medicine and 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Linda G. Canton's work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (9 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (7 papers) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (5 papers). Linda G. Canton is often cited by papers focused on Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (9 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (7 papers) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (5 papers). Linda G. Canton collaborates with scholars based in United States. Linda G. Canton's co-authors include Péter Gloviczki, Jean M. Panneton, Thomas C. Bower, J M Rhodes, Duane M. Ilstrup, Jeffrey M. Rhodes, John J. Bergan, Scott Harmsen, Manju Kalra and William S. Harmsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Journal of Vascular Surgery and The American Journal of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Linda G. Canton

15 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Linda G. Canton United States 14 698 516 253 223 92 17 813
C.H.A. Wittens Netherlands 17 987 1.4× 661 1.3× 546 2.2× 408 1.8× 183 2.0× 47 1.3k
K.T. Delis United Kingdom 13 676 1.0× 632 1.2× 215 0.8× 143 0.6× 94 1.0× 25 824
T. R. Cheatle United Kingdom 15 448 0.6× 334 0.6× 86 0.3× 81 0.4× 50 0.5× 35 531
Michiel A. Schreve Netherlands 18 681 1.0× 249 0.5× 90 0.4× 309 1.4× 37 0.4× 41 787
Agustín Rodríguez United States 9 370 0.5× 244 0.5× 71 0.3× 90 0.4× 40 0.4× 21 541
Kathryn Hollis United States 4 799 1.1× 741 1.4× 393 1.6× 59 0.3× 31 0.3× 5 855
Arjun Jayaraj United States 18 808 1.2× 695 1.3× 370 1.5× 104 0.5× 36 0.4× 64 874
Hayley Moore United Kingdom 11 356 0.5× 379 0.7× 139 0.5× 32 0.1× 22 0.2× 24 497
Marie Josee van Rijn Netherlands 12 352 0.5× 269 0.5× 77 0.3× 348 1.6× 62 0.7× 33 690
B. M. F. Ridler United Kingdom 12 314 0.4× 167 0.3× 45 0.2× 129 0.6× 26 0.3× 18 388

Countries citing papers authored by Linda G. Canton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda G. Canton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda G. Canton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda G. Canton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda G. Canton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda G. Canton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda G. Canton. The network helps show where Linda G. Canton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda G. Canton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda G. Canton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda G. Canton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda G. Canton. Linda G. Canton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Gloviczki, Péter, et al.. (2017). Treatment of chronic headaches with internal jugular vein-to-innominate vein bypass. Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 5(6). 878–879. 2 indexed citations
2.
Jayaraj, Arjun, et al.. (2015). Hybrid intervention for treatment of the nutcracker syndrome. PubMed. 1(4). 268–271. 13 indexed citations
3.
Rosales‐Velderrain, Armando, et al.. (2013). Pulmonary embolism after endovenous thermal ablation of the saphenous vein. Seminars in Vascular Surgery. 26(1). 14–22. 16 indexed citations
4.
Gloviczki, Péter, Gustavo S. Oderich, Audra A. Duncan, et al.. (2012). Clinical Presentation, Age, and Comorbidities but not Female Gender Predict Survival After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (EVAR). Journal of Vascular Surgery. 56(4). 1188–1189.
5.
Elkouri, Stéphane, Péter Gloviczki, Michael A. McKusick, et al.. (2003). Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Initial Experience With 100 Consecutive Patients. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 78(10). 1234–1242. 24 indexed citations
6.
Kalra, Manju, Péter Gloviczki, James C. Andrews, et al.. (2003). Open surgical and endovascular treatment of superior vena cava syndrome caused by nonmalignant disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 38(2). 215–223. 132 indexed citations
7.
Kalra, Manju, Péter Gloviczki, Audra A. Noel, et al.. (2002). Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Vein Surgery in Patients with Post-Thrombotic Venous Insufficiency - Is It Justified?. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 36(1). 41–50. 28 indexed citations
8.
Kalra, Manju, Péter Gloviczki, Thomas C. Bower, et al.. (2001). Limb salvage after successful pedal bypass grafting is associated with improved long-term survival. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 33(1). 6–16. 82 indexed citations
9.
Panneton, Jean M., Péter Gloviczki, Thomas C. Bower, et al.. (2000). Pedal Bypass for Limb Salvage: Impact of Diabetes on Long-Term Outcome. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 14(6). 640–647. 36 indexed citations
10.
Rhodes, Jeffrey M., Péter Gloviczki, Thomas C. Bower, et al.. (1999). The benefits of secondary interventions in patients with failing or failed pedal bypass grafts. The American Journal of Surgery. 178(2). 151–155. 27 indexed citations
11.
Gloviczki, Péter, John J. Bergan, J M Rhodes, et al.. (1999). Mid-term results of endoscopic perforator vein interruption for chronic venous insufficiency: Lessons learned from the North American Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery registry. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 29(3). 489–502. 201 indexed citations
12.
Rhodes, Jeffrey M., et al.. (1998). Factors affecting clinical outcome following endoscopic perforator vein ablation. The American Journal of Surgery. 176(2). 162–167. 47 indexed citations
13.
Alimi, Yves, Péter Gloviczki, Terri J. Vrtiska, et al.. (1998). Reconstruction of the superior vena cava: Benefits of postoperative surveillance and secondary endovascular interventions. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 27(2). 287–301. 36 indexed citations
14.
Rhodes, Jeffrey M., et al.. (1998). Endoscopic perforator vein division with ablation of superficial reflux improves venous hemodynamics. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 28(5). 839–847. 53 indexed citations
15.
Gloviczki, Péter, Linda G. Canton, Thomas C. Bower, et al.. (1997). The Case for Aggressive Treatment. Vascular Surgery. 31(3). 319–320.
16.
Panneton, Jean M., Péter Gloviczki, Linda G. Canton, et al.. (1996). Aortic Reconstruction in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 10(2). 97–108. 28 indexed citations
17.
Gloviczki, Péter, Robert A. Cambria, Robert Y. Rhee, Linda G. Canton, & Michael A. McKusick. (1996). Surgical technique and preliminary results of endoscopic subfascial division of perforating veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 23(3). 517–523. 88 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026