Liam Williams
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 2
-
- Enzyme Production and Characterization 3
- Co-authors
- Donald R. Love (6 shared papers)Peter L. Bergquist (8 shared papers)David J. Saul (5 shared papers)Larry Chamley (2 shared papers)Brent R. Copp (1 shared paper)Sophie Laurenson (1 shared paper)Franz B. Pichler (1 shared paper)Andrew Dodd (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (2 papers)Current Biology (1 paper)Neuroscience (1 paper)Clinical Breast Cancer (1 paper)Nature Biotechnology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Liam Williams
19 papers receiving 606 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Biotechnology 155
- Sensory Systems 72
- Nutrition and Dietetics 94
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 107
- Molecular Biology 352
Countries citing papers authored by Liam Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Williams. The network helps show where Liam Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 131 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 95 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 62 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 59 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 53 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About Liam Williams
Liam Williams is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Biotechnology, Cell Biology, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (5 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (155 citations), Sensory Systems (72 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (94 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (107 citations) and Molecular Biology (352 citations). Liam Williams has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Donald R. Love, Peter L. Bergquist, David J. Saul, Larry Chamley, Brent R. Copp, Sophie Laurenson, Franz B. Pichler, Andrew Dodd, Rosalind A. Reeves and Richard L. M. Faull. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Current Biology, Neuroscience, Clinical Breast Cancer and Nature Biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.