Li Kuang
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Topics
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (28 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (16 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Li Kuang
78 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Clinical Psychology 772
- Cognitive Neuroscience 357
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 274
- Psychiatry and Mental health 220
- General Health Professions 176
Countries citing papers authored by Li Kuang
This map shows the geographic impact of Li Kuang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Kuang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Kuang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Li Kuang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Kuang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Kuang. The network helps show where Li Kuang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Li Kuang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Li Kuang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Li Kuang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Li Kuang. Li Kuang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | Psychological resilience, depression, anxiety, and somatization symptoms in response to COVID-19: A study of the general population in China at the peak of its epidemicbreakdown → | 321 |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | Survey on suicide attempts and influencing factors of college students in Chongqing | 1 |
| 20 | Association between cerebral hippocampal formation and depressive disorder | 5 |
About Li Kuang
Li Kuang is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (28 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (16 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (772 citations), Biological Psychiatry (73 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (274 citations). Li Kuang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wo Wang, Ming Ai, Jianmei Chen, Liuyi Ran, Yiting Kong, Jun Cao, Jianmei Chen, Dongdong Zhou, Ming Ai and Xiaoming Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.