Lewis C. Linker

1.2k total citations
57 papers, 810 citations indexed

About

Lewis C. Linker is a scholar working on Oceanography, Water Science and Technology and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Lewis C. Linker has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 810 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Oceanography, 20 papers in Water Science and Technology and 18 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Lewis C. Linker's work include Marine and coastal ecosystems (30 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (18 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (16 papers). Lewis C. Linker is often cited by papers focused on Marine and coastal ecosystems (30 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (18 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (16 papers). Lewis C. Linker collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lewis C. Linker's co-authors include Gary W. Shenk, Richard A. Batiuk, Carl F. Cerco, G. Bhatt, Ping Wang, Robin L. Dennis, Richard Tian, Jing Wu, Ping Wang and Jeremy M. Testa and has published in prestigious journals such as Atmospheric Environment, Ecological Applications and Journal of Environmental Quality.

In The Last Decade

Lewis C. Linker

55 papers receiving 770 citations

Peers

Lewis C. Linker

OCEAN

WST

GPC

ECOLO

Gary W. Shenk United States

Erica Matta Italy

José Stech Brazil

Diana Vaičiūtė Lithuania

David M. O’Donnell United States

Padmanava Dash United States

Stéphanie Palmer United Kingdom

Moritz K. Lehmann New Zealand

Pradipta R. Muduli India

Thomas Heege Germany

Gary W. Shenk United States

Lewis C. Linker

282 ×0.8

OCEAN

331 ×1.1

WST

344 ×1.2

232 ×1.0

GPC

188 ×1.2

ECOLO

Citations per year, relative to Lewis C. Linker Lewis C. Linker (= 1×) peers Gary W. Shenk

Countries citing papers authored by Lewis C. Linker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lewis C. Linker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lewis C. Linker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lewis C. Linker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lewis C. Linker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lewis C. Linker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lewis C. Linker. The network helps show where Lewis C. Linker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lewis C. Linker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lewis C. Linker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lewis C. Linker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lewis C. Linker. Lewis C. Linker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Toscano‐Pulido, Gregorio, et al.. (2025). Next-generation techniques for parameter reduction for BMP multiobjective optimization in watershed planning. Environmental Modelling & Software. 193. 106651–106651.

Deb, Kalyanmoy, et al.. (2024). Leveraging innovization and transfer learning to optimize best management practices in large-scale watershed management. Environmental Modelling & Software. 180. 106161–106161. 3 indexed citations

Tian, Richard, et al.. (2024). Simulation of benthic microalgae impacts on water quality in shallow water systems, Corsica River, Chesapeake Bay. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10.

Shen, Jian, et al.. (2023). Sea‐Level Rise Impacts on Tidal Marshes and Estuarine Biogeochemical Processes. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences. 128(9). 3 indexed citations

Shen, Jian, et al.. (2023). The Roles of Tidal Marshes in the Estuarine Biochemical Processes: A Numerical Modeling Study. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences. 128(2). 3 indexed citations

Toscano‐Pulido, Gregorio, et al.. (2023). Utilizing Innovization to Solve Large-Scale Multi-Objective Chesapeake Bay Watershed Problem. 1–8. 2 indexed citations

Sabo, Robert D., Emily M. Trentacoste, Qian Zhang, et al.. (2022). Major point and nonpoint sources of nutrient pollution to surface water have declined throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Research Communications. 4(4). 45012–45012. 26 indexed citations

Bertani, Isabella, G. Bhatt, Gary W. Shenk, & Lewis C. Linker. (2021). Quantifying the Response of Nitrogen Speciation to Hydrology in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Using a Multilevel Modeling Approach. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 58(6). 792–804. 4 indexed citations

Tian, Richard, Carl F. Cerco, G. Bhatt, Lewis C. Linker, & Gary W. Shenk. (2021). Mechanisms Controlling Climate Warming Impact on the Occurrence of Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 58(6). 855–875. 26 indexed citations

10.

Capel, Paul D., Matthew P. Miller, Douglas A. Burns, et al.. (2021). Nitrogen in the Chesapeake Bay watershed—A century of change, 1950–2050. U.S. Geological Survey circular. 2019. 2 indexed citations

11.

Burns, Douglas A., G. Bhatt, Lewis C. Linker, et al.. (2021). Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: A history of change. Atmospheric Environment. 251(15). 118277–118277. 18 indexed citations

12.

Shenk, Gary W., G. Bhatt, John Ellis, et al.. (2021). Supporting cost-effective watershed management strategies for Chesapeake Bay using a modeling and optimization framework. Environmental Modelling & Software. 144. 105141–105141. 22 indexed citations

13.

Friedrichs, Marjorie A. M., Carl T. Friedrichs, Aaron J. Bever, et al.. (2016). Challenges associated with modeling low-oxygen waters in Chesapeake Bay: a multiple model comparison. Biogeosciences. 13(7). 2011–2028. 74 indexed citations

14.

Friedrichs, Marjorie A. M., Carl T. Friedrichs, Aaron J. Bever, et al.. (2015). Challenges associated with modeling low-oxygen waters in Chesapeake Bay: a multiple model comparison. 4 indexed citations

15.

Linker, Lewis C., Richard A. Batiuk, Gary W. Shenk, & Carl F. Cerco. (2013). Development of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Allocation. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 49(5). 986–1006. 89 indexed citations

16.

Wang, Ping & Lewis C. Linker. (2008). Improvement of Regression Simulation in Fluvial Sediment Loads. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 134(10). 1527–1531. 15 indexed citations

17.

Wang, Ping & Lewis C. Linker. (2004). A correction of DIN uptake simulation by Michaelis–Menton saturation kinetics in HSPF watershed model to improve DIN export simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software. 21(1). 45–60. 3 indexed citations

18.

Linker, Lewis C., et al.. (2003). SETTING AND ALLOCATING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BASIN NUTRIENT AND SEDIMENT LOADS The Collaborative Process, Technical Tools and Innovative Approaches. 14 indexed citations

19.

Linker, Lewis C., et al.. (2001). Improvement of HSPF watershed model in plant uptake and DIN export from forest. AGUFM. 2001. 1 indexed citations

20.

Linker, Lewis C., et al.. (2001). Effect of Moisture on Nitrogen Export: Comparison of two Plant Uptake Saturation Kinetics Models. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2001. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact