Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes
2000576 citationsA. Searle, Les KirkupPhysiological Measurementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Les Kirkup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Les Kirkup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Les Kirkup more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Les Kirkup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Les Kirkup. The network helps show where Les Kirkup may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Les Kirkup
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Les Kirkup.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Les Kirkup based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Les Kirkup. Les Kirkup is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Braun, Michael, Les Kirkup, & Scott Chadwick. (2018). The Impact of Inquiry Orientation and Other Elements of Cultural Framework on Student Engagement in First Year Laboratory Programs. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 26(4).6 indexed citations
2.
Kirkup, Les, et al.. (2016). A Comparison of Student and Demonstrator Perceptions of Laboratory-Based, Inquiry-Oriented Learning Experiences. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 24(2).6 indexed citations
3.
Kirkup, Les, et al.. (2012). Teaching physics to non-physics majors: models extant in Australian universities. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney).2 indexed citations
4.
Kirkup, Les & S. Lakshmi. (2012). Evaluating enquiry-oriented experiments in a service subject. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference).
5.
Kirkup, Les, et al.. (2012). Are you being serviced? Promoting quality service teaching. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 9.
6.
Kirkup, Les, et al.. (2011). Developing a research integrated learning culture in undergraduate teaching and learning. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference). 17.
7.
Kirkup, Les & Catriona Bonfiglioli. (2011). Research-Inspired Learning Revitalises the Curriculum for First-Year Science. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 19(1).
8.
Kirkup, Les, et al.. (2008). Do student's experiences of a service subject correspond to their expectations?. Acquire (CQUniversity).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.