682 total citations 30 papers, 68 citations indexed
About
Lene Schøsler is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Philosophy and Linguistics and Language.
According to data from OpenAlex, Lene Schøsler has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 68 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Language and Linguistics, 15 papers in Philosophy and 6 papers in Linguistics and Language. Recurrent topics in Lene Schøsler's work include Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (15 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (12 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (8 papers). Lene Schøsler is often cited by papers focused on Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (15 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (12 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (8 papers). Lene Schøsler collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, Italy and Switzerland. Lene Schøsler's co-authors include Lars Heltoft, Wendy Ayres‐Bennett, Michael Talbot and Piet Mertens and has published in prestigious journals such as MLN, Journal of French Language Studies and Diachronica.
In The Last Decade
Lene Schøsler
18 papers
receiving
52 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Lene Schøsler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lene Schøsler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lene Schøsler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lene Schøsler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lene Schøsler. The network helps show where Lene Schøsler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lene Schøsler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lene Schøsler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lene Schøsler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lene Schøsler. Lene Schøsler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schøsler, Lene, et al.. (2021). Actes du XXIXe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes.
3.
Schøsler, Lene. (2020). Le rapport entre continuité référentielle et expression du sujet envisagé dans une perspective diasystématique. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
4.
Schøsler, Lene, et al.. (2018). Repenser les axes diasystématiques : nature et statut ontologique. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
Schøsler, Lene. (2011). Quelques réflexions sur le rapport entre valence et construction. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
Schøsler, Lene. (1984). La déclinaison bicasuelle de l'ancien français : son rôle dans la syntaxe de la phrase, les causes de sa disparation.4 indexed citations
19.
Schøsler, Lene. (1984). La declinaison bicasuelle de l'ancien francais.3 indexed citations
20.
Schøsler, Lene. (1973). Sur la disparition de la déclinaison casuelle de l'ancien français. Revue Romane Langue et littérature International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures. 1.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.