Lawrence Engmann

3.5k total citations
84 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Lawrence Engmann is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Lawrence Engmann has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 60 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 43 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Lawrence Engmann's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (53 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (50 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (41 papers). Lawrence Engmann is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (53 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (50 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (41 papers). Lawrence Engmann collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Lawrence Engmann's co-authors include Claudio Benadiva, John Nulsen, Donald Maier, Andrea DiLuigi, David Schmidt, Jinan Bekir, P. Sladkevicius, Seang Lin Tan, Stuart Campbell and Peter Humaidan and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

Lawrence Engmann

82 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lawrence Engmann United States	27	2.0k	1.7k	1.1k	213	187	84	2.4k
Joan‐Carles Arce Denmark	20	1.4k 0.7×	1.3k 0.7×	587 0.5×	150 0.7×	91 0.5×	62	1.7k
E.A. Widra United States	24	1.4k 0.7×	1.2k 0.7×	832 0.7×	291 1.4×	428 2.3×	71	2.0k
Jacob Farhi Israel	27	1.5k 0.8×	1.3k 0.7×	673 0.6×	233 1.1×	462 2.5×	77	2.0k
J. Conaghan United States	9	1.3k 0.7×	1.5k 0.8×	819 0.7×	196 0.9×	97 0.5×	20	1.9k
Anne Lis Mikkelsen Denmark	19	1.0k 0.5×	1.1k 0.7×	589 0.5×	127 0.6×	67 0.4×	44	1.4k
Cindy Argento Italy	17	1.4k 0.7×	1.2k 0.7×	491 0.4×	70 0.3×	143 0.8×	27	1.6k
F. Ubaldi Italy	24	1.8k 0.9×	1.5k 0.8×	564 0.5×	325 1.5×	174 0.9×	43	2.2k
Fabienne Devreker Belgium	20	1.0k 0.5×	1.1k 0.7×	487 0.4×	97 0.5×	105 0.6×	44	1.6k
G. John Garrisi United States	14	911 0.5×	1.0k 0.6×	595 0.5×	176 0.8×	72 0.4×	23	1.5k
Shai E. Elizur Israel	26	1.1k 0.6×	1.1k 0.6×	452 0.4×	112 0.5×	235 1.3×	66	1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence Engmann

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence Engmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence Engmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence Engmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrence Engmann

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence Engmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence Engmann. The network helps show where Lawrence Engmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lawrence Engmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lawrence Engmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lawrence Engmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lawrence Engmann. Lawrence Engmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Neuber, Evelyn, Daniel R. Grow, Claudio Benadiva, et al.. (2024). The impact of microfluidics sperm processing on blastocyst euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation: a sibling oocyte double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial. Fertility and Sterility. 122(1). 85–94. 5 indexed citations

Benadiva, Claudio, et al.. (2023). Macroprolactinemia: a mini-review and update on clinical practice. F&S Reports. 4(3). 245–250. 8 indexed citations

Benadiva, Claudio, et al.. (2023). A DOUBLE-BLINDED PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING EUPLOIDY RATES AMONG EMBRYOS CREATED FROM SIBLING OOCYTES INJECTED WITH SPERM PROCESSED BY MICROFLUIDICS OR BY DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION. Fertility and Sterility. 120(1). e4–e4. 2 indexed citations

Grow, Daniel R., et al.. (2022). MICROFLUIDIC SPERM SORTING COMPARED WITH TRADITIONAL DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION: A COST ANALYSIS. Fertility and Sterility. 118(4). e142–e142. 1 indexed citations

O’Sullivan, David M., et al.. (2021). Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte–recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 38(6). 1441–1447. 4 indexed citations

Bartolucci, Alison, et al.. (2020). EMBRYOLOGIC OUTCOMES IN INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION (ICSI) CYCLES UTILIZING SPERM SELECTED VIA A MICROFLUIDICS DEVICE COMPARED TO STANDARD SELECTION. Fertility and Sterility. 114(3). e146–e146. 1 indexed citations

Thorne, Jeffrey, et al.. (2019). Impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on gestational carrier (GC) cycles in the United States. Fertility and Sterility. 112(3). e227–e227. 1 indexed citations

Benadiva, Claudio, et al.. (2017). The dual trigger study: Rationale and study design of a prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing pregnancy rates after co-administration of low dose hCG at the time of GnRH agonist trigger or 35 h later for the prevention of OHSS. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 8. 18–24. 4 indexed citations

Bartolucci, Alison, et al.. (2017). Old habits die hard: retrospective analysis of outcomes with use of corticosteroids and antibiotics before embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility. 107(6). 1336–1340. 15 indexed citations

10.

Hansen, Karl R., Aaron K. Styer, Robert A. Wild, et al.. (2016). Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation–intrauterine insemination. Fertility and Sterility. 105(6). 1575–1583.e2. 79 indexed citations

11.

Bartolucci, Alison, et al.. (2015). Occult abnormal pregnancies after first post–embryo transfer serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels of 1.0–5.0 mIU/mL. Fertility and Sterility. 105(4). 938–945.e1. 1 indexed citations

12.

Engmann, Lawrence, et al.. (2015). Survey assessing obesity policies for assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Fertility and Sterility. 105(3). 703–706.e2. 29 indexed citations

13.

Humaidan, Peter, Lawrence Engmann, & Claudio Benadiva. (2015). Luteal phase supplementation after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in fresh embryo transfer: the American versus European approaches. Fertility and Sterility. 103(4). 879–885. 48 indexed citations

14.

Engmann, Lawrence, et al.. (2011). In vitro viability and secretory capacity of human luteinized granulosa cells after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger of oocyte maturation. Fertility and Sterility. 96(1). 198–202. 10 indexed citations

15.

Weitzman, Vanessa N., Lawrence Engmann, Andrea DiLuigi, et al.. (2008). Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes. Fertility and Sterility. 92(1). 226–230. 28 indexed citations

16.

Engmann, Lawrence, Andrea DiLuigi, David Schmidt, et al.. (2007). The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Fertility and Sterility. 89(1). 84–91. 314 indexed citations

17.

Engmann, Lawrence, et al.. (2005). Outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment in patients who electively inseminate a limited number of oocytes to avoid creating surplus human embryos for cryopreservation. Fertility and Sterility. 84(5). 1406–1410. 4 indexed citations

18.

Engmann, Lawrence, Noreen Maconochie, Sinan Tan, & Jinan Bekir. (2001). Trends in the incidence of births and multiple births and the factors that determine the probability of multiple birth after IVF treatment. Human Reproduction. 16(12). 2598–2605. 37 indexed citations

19.

Agrawal, Rina, Gerard S. Conway, P. Sladkevicius, et al.. (1998). Serum vascular endothelial growth factor and Doppler blood flow velocities in in vitro fertilization: relevance to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and polycystic ovaries. Fertility and Sterility. 70(4). 651–658. 88 indexed citations

20.

Sladkevicius, P., Lawrence Engmann, Gerard S. Conway, et al.. (1998). Serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations and ovarian stromal blood flow are increased in women with polycystic ovaries. Human Reproduction. 13(3). 651–655. 139 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact