Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Lavanya Rajamani
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lavanya Rajamani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lavanya Rajamani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lavanya Rajamani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lavanya Rajamani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lavanya Rajamani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lavanya Rajamani. The network helps show where Lavanya Rajamani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lavanya Rajamani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lavanya Rajamani.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lavanya Rajamani based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lavanya Rajamani. Lavanya Rajamani is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bodansky, David & Lavanya Rajamani. (2018). The Issues that Never Die. Carbon & Climate Law Review. 12(3). 184–190.6 indexed citations
3.
Bodansky, Daniel, Jutta Brunnée, & Lavanya Rajamani. (2017). International Climate Change Law. Oxford University Press eBooks.55 indexed citations
4.
Bodansky, Daniel & Lavanya Rajamani. (2015). Key Legal Issues in the 2015 Climate Negotiations. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Bodansky, Daniel & Lavanya Rajamani. (2015). The Evolution and Governance Architecture of the Climate Change Regime. SSRN Electronic Journal.11 indexed citations
Rajamani, Lavanya. (2013). Differentiation in the Emerging Climate Regime. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
8.
Winkler, Harald & Lavanya Rajamani. (2013). CBDR&RC in a Regime Applicable to All. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
9.
Rajamani, Lavanya. (2013). Rights Based Climate Litigation in the Indian Courts: Potential, Prospects & Potential Problems. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Rajamani, Lavanya. (2012). The Durban Platform for Enhanced Action and the Future of the Climate Regime. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
11.
Rajamani, Lavanya, et al.. (2012). Edible films from Polysaccharides. Food science and quality management. 3. 9–17.68 indexed citations
Dubash, Navroz K. & Lavanya Rajamani. (2010). Beyond Copenhagen: next steps. Climate Policy. 10(6). 593–599.31 indexed citations
18.
Rajamani, Lavanya. (2009). 'Cloud' over climate negotiations: from Bangkok to Copenhagen and beyond.. Economic and political weekly. 44(43). 11–15.6 indexed citations
19.
Rajamani, Lavanya. (2009). The copenhagen agreed outcome: form, shape and influence.. Economic and political weekly. 44(48). 30–35.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.