Laura Rees

2.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Laura Rees is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Laura Rees has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Laura Rees's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (5 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers). Laura Rees is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (5 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers). Laura Rees collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Denmark. Laura Rees's co-authors include Tom N. Tombaugh, David A. Gansler, L. Boulay, Lisa A.S. Walker, Jason A. Berard, Shawn Marshall, Mark S. Freedman, Lindsay Berrigan, Margaret Gagnon and Jeffrey Munson and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Care, Psychological Assessment and Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Laura Rees

26 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Normative Data Stratified by Age and Education for Two Me... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Laura Rees Canada 15 625 620 579 375 375 26 2.0k
Luciano Fasotti Netherlands 28 941 1.5× 984 1.6× 646 1.1× 362 1.0× 276 0.7× 87 2.6k
Rani Jacobs Australia 18 649 1.0× 600 1.0× 426 0.7× 193 0.5× 325 0.9× 30 2.3k
Richard I. Naugle United States 25 1.5k 2.4× 952 1.5× 558 1.0× 313 0.8× 339 0.9× 67 2.7k
Thomas Felicetti United States 5 823 1.3× 778 1.3× 1.3k 2.2× 505 1.3× 296 0.8× 11 2.6k
Linda Laatsch United States 13 672 1.1× 613 1.0× 1.1k 1.9× 433 1.2× 242 0.6× 25 2.2k
Claus‐W. Wallesch Germany 31 470 0.8× 1.1k 1.7× 673 1.2× 771 2.1× 162 0.4× 101 2.7k
Jerid M. Fisher United States 11 503 0.8× 635 1.0× 422 0.7× 202 0.5× 245 0.7× 18 1.6k
Cynthia Dahlberg United States 4 586 0.9× 558 0.9× 1.0k 1.7× 337 0.9× 178 0.5× 6 1.9k
Donna M. Langenbahn United States 15 1.1k 1.8× 921 1.5× 1.6k 2.8× 625 1.7× 387 1.0× 23 3.4k
Lowell D. Groninger United States 12 718 1.1× 693 1.1× 220 0.4× 252 0.7× 282 0.8× 26 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Rees. The network helps show where Laura Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Rees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Rees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Rees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Rees. Laura Rees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Berrigan, Lindsay, Jo‐Anne LeFevre, Laura Rees, et al.. (2022). The symbol digit modalities test and the paced auditory serial addition test involve more than processing speed. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 68. 104229–104229. 5 indexed citations
2.
Walker, Lisa A.S., Jason A. Berard, Laura Rees, et al.. (2016). Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS): Canadian contribution to the international validation project. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 362. 147–152. 53 indexed citations
4.
Bédard, Michel, Melissa Felteau, Shawn Marshall, et al.. (2013). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Reduces Symptoms of Depression in People With a Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 29(4). E13–E22. 84 indexed citations
5.
Berrigan, Lindsay, Jo‐Anne LeFevre, Laura Rees, et al.. (2013). Cognition in Early Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Consequences May Be Relative to Working Memory. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 19(8). 938–949. 14 indexed citations
6.
Walker, Lisa A.S., Jason A. Berard, Lindsay Berrigan, Laura Rees, & Mark S. Freedman. (2012). Detecting cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Method matters. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 316(1-2). 86–92. 56 indexed citations
7.
Gibbons, Carrie, Melissa Felteau, Nora Cullen, et al.. (2012). Training Clinicians to Deliver a Mindfulness Intervention. Mindfulness. 5(3). 232–237. 6 indexed citations
8.
Walker, Lisa A.S., Amy Cheng, Jason A. Berard, et al.. (2012). Tests of Information Processing Speed. International Journal of MS Care. 14(2). 92–99. 20 indexed citations
9.
Frenette, Anne Julie, Salmaan Kanji, Laura Rees, et al.. (2011). Efficacy and Safety of Dopamine Agonists in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Neurotrauma. 29(1). 1–18. 61 indexed citations
10.
Bryson, Gregory L., Anna Wyand, Denise Wozny, et al.. (2011). A prospective cohort study evaluating associations among delirium, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and apolipoprotein E genotype following open aortic repair. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 58(3). 246–255. 52 indexed citations
11.
12.
Bryson, Gregory L., Anna Wyand, Denise Wozny, et al.. (2010). The clock drawing test is a poor screening tool for postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction after aortic repair. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 58(3). 267–274. 12 indexed citations
13.
Rees, Laura, et al.. (2007). Cognitive interventions post acquired brain injury. Brain Injury. 21(2). 161–200. 81 indexed citations
14.
Rees, Laura, et al.. (2006). Assessing the efficacy of HME filters at preventing contamination of breathing systems*. Anaesthesia. 62(1). 67–71. 6 indexed citations
15.
Tombaugh, Tom N., et al.. (2004). The Effects of List Difficulty and Modality of Presentation on a Computerized Version of the Paced Serial Addition Test (PSAT). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 26(2). 257–265. 23 indexed citations
16.
Rees, Laura. (2001). Depression and the Test of Memory Malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 16(5). 501–506. 10 indexed citations
17.
Rees, Laura, Tom N. Tombaugh, & L. Boulay. (2001). Depression and the Test of Memory Malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 16(5). 501–506. 127 indexed citations
18.
Rees, Laura, et al.. (2000). The Test of Memory Malingering 2 (TOMM-2). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 15(8). 817–818. 69 indexed citations
19.
Rees, Laura. (1998). Normative data for two verbal fluency tests (FAS and “Animals”) for 1300 cognitively intact individuals aged 16–90 years. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 13(1). 101–101. 5 indexed citations
20.
Gansler, David A., et al.. (1996). Test of motivation/malingering (TOMM): Initial validation in a traumatic brain injury cohort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 11(5). 393–394. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026