L. Mitchell

421 total citations
9 papers, 278 citations indexed

About

L. Mitchell is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Oncology and Dermatology. According to data from OpenAlex, L. Mitchell has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 278 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 4 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Dermatology. Recurrent topics in L. Mitchell's work include Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (4 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (3 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers). L. Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (4 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (3 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers). L. Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. L. Mitchell's co-authors include Catherine Harwood, Charlotte M. Proby, Robert Newton, Delphine Casabonne, Abha Gulati, Peter Sasieni, Martin Raftery, R. Cerio, Irene M. Leigh and M. Leedham-Green and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Annals of Oncology and International Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

L. Mitchell

8 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
L. Mitchell United Kingdom 7 196 151 119 36 17 9 278
Ruud Valks Spain 10 87 0.4× 50 0.3× 266 2.2× 24 0.7× 18 1.1× 28 324
Sophia Colantonio Canada 7 66 0.3× 80 0.5× 222 1.9× 29 0.8× 16 0.9× 16 331
Yaei Togawa Japan 10 56 0.3× 34 0.2× 102 0.9× 45 1.3× 26 1.5× 24 235
Kirk Barber Canada 12 112 0.6× 44 0.3× 249 2.1× 13 0.4× 20 1.2× 27 337
Leonor Ramos Portugal 8 61 0.3× 19 0.1× 165 1.4× 17 0.5× 23 1.4× 26 241
Suvi‐Päivikki Sinikumpu Finland 9 55 0.3× 33 0.2× 125 1.1× 6 0.2× 15 0.9× 41 242
Mireia Sàbat Spain 5 108 0.6× 67 0.4× 58 0.5× 4 0.1× 12 0.7× 13 170
Inês Lobo Portugal 6 80 0.4× 23 0.2× 73 0.6× 10 0.3× 21 1.2× 29 141
K. C. Moon South Korea 9 92 0.5× 47 0.3× 77 0.6× 4 0.1× 37 2.2× 19 211
Zeynep Meltem Akkurt Türkiye 9 47 0.2× 30 0.2× 78 0.7× 8 0.2× 34 2.0× 32 220

Countries citing papers authored by L. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Mitchell. The network helps show where L. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Mitchell. L. Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Eng, Lawson, L. Mitchell, Muh‐Lii Liang, et al.. (2018). What information and features do young and older adults with cancer want in their hospital-based social media cancer resource?. Annals of Oncology. 29. viii630–viii630.
2.
Oh, Choon Chiat, Günther F.L. Hofbauer, Andreas L. Serra, et al.. (2016). Painful skin lesions and squamous cell carcinoma predict overall mortality risk in organ transplant recipients: a cohort study. British Journal of Dermatology. 176(5). 1179–1186. 6 indexed citations
3.
Harwood, Catherine, David Mesher, J.M. McGregor, et al.. (2012). A Surveillance Model for Skin Cancer in Organ Transplant Recipients: A 22-Year Prospective Study in an Ethnically Diverse Population. American Journal of Transplantation. 13(1). 119–129. 94 indexed citations
4.
Casabonne, Delphine, Tim Waterboer, Kristina M. Michael, et al.. (2009). The seroprevalence of human papillomavirus by immune status and by ethnicity in London. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 4(1). 14–14. 15 indexed citations
5.
Casabonne, Delphine, Tim Waterboer, Kristina M. Michael, et al.. (2009). The sero-epidemiology of human papillomavirus among Caucasian transplant recipients in the UK. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 4(1). 13–13. 12 indexed citations
6.
Casabonne, Delphine, Aoife Lally, L. Mitchell, et al.. (2009). A case‐control study of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma among Caucasian organ transplant recipients: The role of antibodies against human papillomavirus and other risk factors. International Journal of Cancer. 125(8). 1935–1945. 23 indexed citations
7.
Mitchell, L., Delphine Casabonne, Abha Gulati, et al.. (2006). Specialist dermatology clinics for organ transplant recipients significantly improve compliance with photoprotection and levels of skin cancer awareness. British Journal of Dermatology. 155(5). 916–925. 77 indexed citations
8.
Zwerling, Craig, Leon F. Burmeister, Stephen J. Reynolds, et al.. (1997). Use of Rollover Protective Structures—Iowa, Kentucky, New York, and Ohio, 1992-1997. JAMA. 278(14). 1144–1144. 6 indexed citations
9.
Mitchell, L., et al.. (1994). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of employer-issued back belts in areas of high risk for back injury.. PubMed. 36(1). 90–4. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026