Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to L. Hunter Lovins L. Hunter Lovins (= 1×)
peers
Paul Hawken
Countries citing papers authored by L. Hunter Lovins
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of L. Hunter Lovins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Hunter Lovins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Hunter Lovins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. Hunter Lovins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Hunter Lovins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Hunter Lovins. The network helps show where L. Hunter Lovins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Hunter Lovins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Hunter Lovins.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Hunter Lovins based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with L. Hunter Lovins. L. Hunter Lovins is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hawken, Paul, Amory B. Lovins, & L. Hunter Lovins. (2017). Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution. Medical Entomology and Zoology.66 indexed citations
3.
Hawken, Paul, Amory B. Lovins, & L. Hunter Lovins. (2013). Natural Capitalism.59 indexed citations
Lovins, Amory B., L. Hunter Lovins, & Paul Hawken. (2008). Una ruta hacia el capitalismo natural. Harvard business review. 86(6). 68–82.6 indexed citations
6.
Lovins, Amory B., L. Hunter Lovins, & Paul Hawken. (2006). A Road Map for Natural Capitalism. PubMed. 77(3). 218–234.215 indexed citations
7.
Lovins, L. Hunter, et al.. (2005). Energy and Sustainable Agriculture. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).1 indexed citations
Lovins, Amory B. & L. Hunter Lovins. (2001). Fool's Gold in Alaska. Foreign Affairs. 80(4). 72–72.2 indexed citations
10.
Lovins, L. Hunter & Amory B. Lovins. (2000). Pathway to Sustainability. 15(4). 13.6 indexed citations
11.
Sabel, Charles F., Archon Fung, Bradley C. Karkkainen, et al.. (2000). Beyond Backyard Environmentalism. Medical Entomology and Zoology.65 indexed citations
12.
Weizsäcker, Ernst Ulrich von, Amory B. Lovins, & L. Hunter Lovins. (1997). Faktor Vier : doppelter Wohlstand - halbierter Naturverbrauch ; der neue Bericht an den Club of Rome.52 indexed citations
13.
Weizsäcker, Ernst Ulrich von, Amory B. Lovins, & L. Hunter Lovins. (1997). Factor 4 : duplicar el bienestar con la mitad de los recursos naturales.1 indexed citations
Lovins, Amory B., L. Hunter Lovins, Florentin Krause, & Wolfgang Bach. (1982). Least-cost energy: solving the CO/sub 2/ problem. Medical Entomology and Zoology.30 indexed citations
Lovins, Amory B. & L. Hunter Lovins. (1981). Energy policies for resilience and national security. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 82. 18700.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.