L. Åhlén

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 367 citations indexed

About

L. Åhlén is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, L. Åhlén has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 367 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 1 paper in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in L. Åhlén's work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (5 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (4 papers). L. Åhlén is often cited by papers focused on Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (5 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (4 papers). L. Åhlén collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Finland and France. L. Åhlén's co-authors include A. I. Eriksson, R. Gill, Jan‐Erik Wahlund, S. Buchert, D. J. Knudsen, J. K. Burchill, M. S. Smith, S.-E. Jansson, J. A. Holtet and R. Bostrōm and has published in prestigious journals such as Space Science Reviews, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Advances in Space Research.

In The Last Decade

L. Åhlén

9 papers receiving 355 citations

Hit Papers

Thermal ion imagers and Langmuir probes in the Swarm elec... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
L. Åhlén Sweden 6 337 110 108 61 32 9 367
R. Gill Sweden 6 531 1.6× 188 1.7× 118 1.1× 68 1.1× 30 0.9× 9 561
M. Hirahara Japan 13 574 1.7× 184 1.7× 88 0.8× 34 0.6× 21 0.7× 41 606
M. L. Adrian United States 12 389 1.2× 91 0.8× 117 1.1× 23 0.4× 19 0.6× 28 416
M. Iizima Japan 13 499 1.5× 166 1.5× 237 2.2× 98 1.6× 22 0.7× 44 514
V. N. Coffey United States 9 281 0.8× 79 0.7× 88 0.8× 29 0.5× 26 0.8× 23 295
V. L. Frolov Russia 12 410 1.2× 126 1.1× 278 2.6× 56 0.9× 26 0.8× 28 453
Nick Omidi United States 9 346 1.0× 101 0.9× 67 0.6× 19 0.3× 15 0.5× 11 361
K. Svenes Norway 14 684 2.0× 270 2.5× 83 0.8× 84 1.4× 57 1.8× 38 724
Walter R. Hoegy United States 10 312 0.9× 53 0.5× 100 0.9× 64 1.0× 45 1.4× 23 359
R. A. Doe United States 14 422 1.3× 144 1.3× 148 1.4× 107 1.8× 19 0.6× 26 447

Countries citing papers authored by L. Åhlén

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Åhlén's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Åhlén with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Åhlén more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Åhlén

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Åhlén. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Åhlén. The network helps show where L. Åhlén may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Åhlén

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Åhlén. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Åhlén based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Åhlén. L. Åhlén is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Karlsson, Tomas, Yasumasa Kasaba, Jan‐Erik Wahlund, et al.. (2020). The MEFISTO and WPT Electric Field Sensors of the Plasma Wave Investigation on the BepiColombo Mio Spacecraft. Space Science Reviews. 216(8). 5 indexed citations
2.
Knudsen, D. J., J. K. Burchill, S. Buchert, et al.. (2017). Thermal ion imagers and Langmuir probes in the Swarm electric field instruments. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 122(2). 2655–2673. 211 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Buchert, S., A. I. Eriksson, R. Gill, et al.. (2014). First electron density and temperature estimates from the Swarm Langmuir probes and a comparison with IS measurements. EGUGA. 12479. 1 indexed citations
4.
Buchert, S., A. I. Eriksson, R. Gill, et al.. (2014). First results from the Langmuir Probes on the Swarm satellites. 1–1. 2 indexed citations
5.
Ronchi, E., E. Andersson Sundén, S. Conroy, et al.. (2008). A bipolar LED drive technique for high performance, stability and power in the nanosecond time scale. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 599(2-3). 243–247. 6 indexed citations
6.
Eriksson, A. I., R. Bostrōm, R. Gill, et al.. (2006). RPC-LAP: The Rosetta Langmuir Probe Instrument. Space Science Reviews. 128(1-4). 729–744. 102 indexed citations
7.
Blomberg, L. G., H. Matsumoto, Jean‐Louis Bougeret, et al.. (2005). MEFISTO – An electric field instrument for BepiColombo/MMO. Advances in Space Research. 38(4). 672–679. 15 indexed citations
8.
Holback, B., L. Åhlén, S.-E. Jansson, et al.. (2001). LINDA – the Astrid-2 Langmuir probe instrument. Annales Geophysicae. 19(6). 601–610. 11 indexed citations
9.
Trotignon, J. G., R. Bostrōm, J. L. Burch, et al.. (1999). The Rosetta plasma consortium: Technical realization and scientific aims. Advances in Space Research. 24(9). 1149–1158. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026