Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with pravastatin in Japan (MEGA Study): a prospective randomised controlled trial
2006686 citationsHaruo Nakamura, Kyoichi Mizuno et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Kyoichi Mizuno
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyoichi Mizuno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyoichi Mizuno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyoichi Mizuno more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyoichi Mizuno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyoichi Mizuno. The network helps show where Kyoichi Mizuno may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kyoichi Mizuno
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kyoichi Mizuno.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kyoichi Mizuno based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kyoichi Mizuno. Kyoichi Mizuno is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Takahashi, Yasuhiro, Hitoshi Takano, Hidenori Komiyama, et al.. (2008). PJ-424 Adenosine Triphosphate Disodium Administration During Reperfusion Preserves Microvascular Integrity and Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction(Cardiovascular pharmacology, basic/clinical(05)(H),Poster Session(Japanese),The 72nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Circulation Society). Japanese Circulation Journal-english Edition. 72. 618–619.1 indexed citations
16.
Seino, Yoshihiko, Teruyo Yamashita, Masato Fukushima, et al.. (2005). Multi-biomarker Approach Stratifies Vulnerable Plaque with Sub-occlusive Thrombus, Minor Myocardial Damage, and Ischemic Insult in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome(Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome, The 69th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Circulation Society). Japanese Circulation Journal-english Edition. 69. 13–14.2 indexed citations
17.
Inami, Shigenobu, Tomohiro Ogawa, Kentaro Okamatsu, et al.. (2003). Acute Coronary Syndrome Is Not a Local Vascular Accident but a Pancoronary Process. Japanese Circulation Journal-english Edition. 67. 368.1 indexed citations
Mizuno, Kyoichi, Akira Miyamoto, Masami Sakurada, et al.. (1990). -0186-COMPARISON OF FINDINGS BETWEEN CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND ANGIOSCOPY. Japanese Circulation Journal-english Edition. 54(7). 751.
20.
Uehata, Akimi, Akira Kurita, Bonpei Takase, et al.. (1983). 11) INCIDENCES OF CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS AND MEAN QRS VECTOR ON THE FRONTAL PLANE VECTORCARDIOGRAM IN PATIENTS WITH INFERIOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. Japanese Circulation Journal-english Edition. 47(7). 860–861.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.