Kyle Lanclos

631 total citations
10 papers, 62 citations indexed

About

Kyle Lanclos is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kyle Lanclos has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 62 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5 papers in Instrumentation and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Kyle Lanclos's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (2 papers). Kyle Lanclos is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (2 papers). Kyle Lanclos collaborates with scholars based in United States. Kyle Lanclos's co-authors include William Deich, Marc Kassis, Ted Aliado, Eric Wang, Jason Weiss, Emily C. Martin, Evan Kress, Ian S. McLean, John V. Canfield and Christopher S. Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE and Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII.

In The Last Decade

Kyle Lanclos

7 papers receiving 51 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kyle Lanclos United States 5 52 14 7 6 5 10 62
Evan Kress United States 5 54 1.0× 13 0.9× 5 0.7× 10 1.7× 10 2.0× 9 63
Masato Ishizuka Japan 4 41 0.8× 15 1.1× 11 1.6× 4 0.7× 9 1.8× 6 52
David Grant United Kingdom 6 64 1.2× 20 1.4× 5 0.7× 6 1.0× 4 0.8× 9 76
R. Haigron France 1 92 1.8× 19 1.4× 6 0.9× 6 1.0× 4 0.8× 3 94
F. Motalebi Spain 3 60 1.2× 17 1.2× 7 1.0× 4 0.7× 2 0.4× 4 68
Marc Maschmann Netherlands 2 44 0.8× 26 1.9× 17 2.4× 10 1.7× 10 2.0× 4 58
William O. Balmer United States 5 71 1.4× 15 1.1× 6 0.9× 3 0.5× 5 1.0× 13 79
Kyu‐Ha Hwang South Korea 4 46 0.9× 14 1.0× 12 1.7× 6 1.0× 3 0.6× 14 49
Mihoko Konishi Japan 6 95 1.8× 12 0.9× 11 1.6× 3 0.5× 19 3.8× 13 112
R. Tronsgaard Denmark 6 63 1.2× 26 1.9× 5 0.7× 8 1.3× 7 1.4× 8 67

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Lanclos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Lanclos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Lanclos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Lanclos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Lanclos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Lanclos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Lanclos. The network helps show where Kyle Lanclos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kyle Lanclos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kyle Lanclos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kyle Lanclos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kyle Lanclos. Kyle Lanclos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Kassis, Marc, et al.. (2022). A fiber injection unit for the Keck Planet Finder: opto-mechanical design. 9908. 172–172. 1 indexed citations
2.
Walawender, Josh, et al.. (2022). Broadening access to remote observing at W. M. Keck Observatory. 34–34.
3.
López, Ronald, Michael P. Fitzgerald, Chris E. Johnson, et al.. (2020). Characterization and performance of the upgraded NIRSPEC on the W. M. Keck Telescope. 121–121. 4 indexed citations
4.
Fitzgerald, Michael P., Ian S. McLean, Marc Kassis, et al.. (2018). An overview of the NIRSPEC upgrade for the Keck II telescope. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII. 9–9. 30 indexed citations
5.
Lanclos, Kyle, William Deich, B. Holden, & S. L. Allen. (2016). Key software architecture decisions for the automated planet finder. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9913. 99134C–99134C.
6.
Lanclos, Kyle, et al.. (2014). Tuning a 2.4-meter telescope... blindfolded. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9145. 91454B–91454B. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lanclos, Kyle, B. Holden, Robert I. Kibrick, et al.. (2014). The automated planet finder at Lick Observatory. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9145. 91452B–91452B. 12 indexed citations
8.
Gavel, Donald T., Renate Kupke, Daren Dillon, et al.. (2014). ShaneAO: wide science spectrum adaptive optics system for the Lick Observatory. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9148. 914805–914805. 10 indexed citations
9.
Lanclos, Kyle & William Deich. (2012). A complete history of everything. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8451. 84510Y–84510Y. 4 indexed citations
10.
Kibrick, Robert I., Gregory D. Wirth, E. L. Gates, et al.. (2010). A shared approach to supporting remote observing for multiple observatories. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7737. 773712–773712.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026