Kyle Haustveit

480 total citations
27 papers, 350 citations indexed

About

Kyle Haustveit is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kyle Haustveit has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 350 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Ocean Engineering, 22 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 14 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in Kyle Haustveit's work include Drilling and Well Engineering (23 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (22 papers) and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (14 papers). Kyle Haustveit is often cited by papers focused on Drilling and Well Engineering (23 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (22 papers) and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (14 papers). Kyle Haustveit collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Norway. Kyle Haustveit's co-authors include Wolfgang Deeg, Jackson Haffener, R. D. Barree, Jennifer Miskimins, Matthew Dawson, Paul Huckabee, Gustavo Ugueto, Magdalena Wojtaszek, Ge Jin and Artur Guzik and has published in prestigious journals such as SPE Drilling & Completion, SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).

In The Last Decade

Kyle Haustveit

27 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kyle Haustveit United States 10 320 298 173 40 15 27 350
Yunhui Tan United States 12 230 0.7× 234 0.8× 230 1.3× 45 1.1× 19 1.3× 31 327
Mark McClure United States 10 210 0.7× 219 0.7× 103 0.6× 50 1.3× 15 1.0× 30 269
Darren D. Schmidt United States 8 202 0.6× 201 0.7× 92 0.5× 49 1.2× 48 3.2× 26 272
Kyle Friehauf United States 11 415 1.3× 436 1.5× 168 1.0× 98 2.5× 26 1.7× 20 500
Ce Diao China 7 284 0.9× 332 1.1× 127 0.7× 197 4.9× 26 1.7× 10 374
Erkan Fidan Kuwait 8 324 1.0× 278 0.9× 154 0.9× 45 1.1× 25 1.7× 29 417
Lasse Renlie Norway 9 228 0.7× 135 0.5× 290 1.7× 87 2.2× 10 0.7× 20 341
Piyush Pankaj British Virgin Islands 12 306 1.0× 290 1.0× 70 0.4× 84 2.1× 9 0.6× 41 341
R. G. Keck United States 11 280 0.9× 284 1.0× 81 0.5× 74 1.9× 24 1.6× 29 345
Murtadha J. AlTammar United States 10 230 0.7× 254 0.9× 70 0.4× 169 4.2× 47 3.1× 60 338

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Haustveit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Haustveit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Haustveit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Haustveit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Haustveit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Haustveit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Haustveit. The network helps show where Kyle Haustveit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kyle Haustveit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kyle Haustveit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kyle Haustveit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kyle Haustveit. Kyle Haustveit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Titov, Aleksei, Jack Norbeck, Kevin Pelton, et al.. (2024). Optimization of Enhanced Geothermal System Operations Using Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing and Offset Pressure Monitoring. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 2 indexed citations
3.
Weijers, Leen, et al.. (2023). A Back-Of-The-Envelope Model to Estimate Dimensions for Every Shale Frac. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 1 indexed citations
4.
Haffener, Jackson, Sarah B. White, Eric Hart, et al.. (2023). Redefining Recoverable Reserves in the Eagle Ford: Refracs and Infill Development Lessons Learned From the Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site 1 (HFTS) Phase 3. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 8 indexed citations
5.
Haustveit, Kyle & Jackson Haffener. (2023). Can You Feel the Pressure? Strain-Based Pressure Estimates. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 6 indexed citations
6.
Huckabee, Paul, et al.. (2022). Completions and Stimulation Experimental Design, Execution, Analysis & Application for the Permian Delaware Basin Hydraulic Fracture Test Site 2. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 12 indexed citations
7.
Zheng, Shuang, et al.. (2022). Integration of Sealed Wellbore Pressure Monitoring Responses with Wellbore Strain and Deformation Measurements for Fracture Diagnostics. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 6 indexed citations
8.
Haffener, Jackson, et al.. (2022). Understanding the Hydraulic and Conductive Half Lengths in the Bakken/Three Forks Play – Coupling Sealed Wellbore Pressure Monitoring SWPM & Chow Pressure Group CPG. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 5 indexed citations
9.
Haffener, Jackson, et al.. (2022). Did We Break New Rock? Utilizing Diagnostics to Differentiate New Fracture Creation vs Old Fracture Reactivation: A Meramec and Wolfcamp Study. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 13 indexed citations
10.
Cipolla, Craig, et al.. (2022). Hydraulic Fracture Geometry, Morphology, and Parent-Child Interactions: Bakken Case Study. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 3 indexed citations
11.
Haustveit, Kyle, et al.. (2022). Empirical Meets Analytical-Novel Case Study Quantifies Fracture Stress Shadowing and Net Pressure Using Bottom Hole Pressure and Optical Fiber. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 10 indexed citations
12.
Ugueto, Gustavo, et al.. (2022). Spatial and Temporal Effects on Low Frequency DAS and Microseismic Implications on Hydraulic Fracture Geometry and Well Interactions. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 11 indexed citations
13.
Ugueto, Gustavo, Magdalena Wojtaszek, Paul Huckabee, et al.. (2021). An Integrated View of Hydraulic Induced Fracture Geometry in Hydraulic Fracture Test Site 2. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 33 indexed citations
14.
Haustveit, Kyle, et al.. (2020). Monitoring the Pulse of a Well Through Sealed Wellbore Pressure Monitoring, a Breakthrough Diagnostic With a Multi-Basin Case Study. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 56 indexed citations
16.
Haustveit, Kyle, et al.. (2019). Far-Field Proppant Imaging Offsetting Depletion: A STACK Case History. Proceedings of the 7th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. 3 indexed citations
17.
Haustveit, Kyle, et al.. (2018). Delineating Stacked Pay with Existing and Emerging Diagnostic Tools. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 5 indexed citations
19.
Haustveit, Kyle, et al.. (2017). New Age Fracture Mapping Diagnostic Tools-A STACK Case Study. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 45 indexed citations
20.
Haustveit, Kyle, et al.. (2016). A Case Study of Completion Effectiveness in the Eagle Ford Shale Using DAS/DTS Observations and Hydraulic Fracture Modeling. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. 80 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026