Kyle Barcus

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Kyle Barcus is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Polymers and Plastics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kyle Barcus has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 4 papers in Materials Chemistry and 2 papers in Polymers and Plastics. Recurrent topics in Kyle Barcus's work include Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (8 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (2 papers) and Perovskite Materials and Applications (1 paper). Kyle Barcus is often cited by papers focused on Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (8 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (2 papers) and Perovskite Materials and Applications (1 paper). Kyle Barcus collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Kyle Barcus's co-authors include Seth M. Cohen, Mark Kalaj, Yuji Katayama, Joseph M. Palomba, Kyle C. Bentz, Sergio Ayala, Jin Yeong Kim, Mohammad R. Momeni, Francesco Paesani and Yilong Zhou and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and ACS Nano.

In The Last Decade

Kyle Barcus

9 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

MOF-Polymer Hybrid Materials: From Simple Composites to T... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kyle Barcus United States 8 677 604 226 176 174 9 1.0k
Bohan Shan United States 17 749 1.1× 623 1.0× 235 1.0× 213 1.2× 136 0.8× 27 1.1k
Roman Nayuk Germany 7 891 1.3× 750 1.2× 212 0.9× 203 1.2× 153 0.9× 7 1.2k
Sergej Springer Germany 7 732 1.1× 631 1.0× 196 0.9× 170 1.0× 126 0.7× 7 1.0k
Timothée Stassin Belgium 16 919 1.4× 926 1.5× 205 0.9× 316 1.8× 257 1.5× 23 1.4k
Xing Duan China 22 838 1.2× 818 1.4× 279 1.2× 157 0.9× 104 0.6× 60 1.3k
Ina Strauß Germany 11 817 1.2× 882 1.5× 442 2.0× 307 1.7× 206 1.2× 15 1.4k
Abhijit Krishna Adhikari Taiwan 11 506 0.7× 502 0.8× 198 0.9× 128 0.7× 91 0.5× 16 796
Yeonshick Yoo South Korea 12 913 1.3× 817 1.4× 486 2.2× 169 1.0× 134 0.8× 15 1.2k
Chengli Jiao China 19 895 1.3× 1.1k 1.9× 589 2.6× 297 1.7× 185 1.1× 48 1.7k
Alfonso García‐Márquez France 11 573 0.8× 397 0.7× 102 0.5× 95 0.5× 191 1.1× 15 825

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Barcus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Barcus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Barcus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Barcus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Barcus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Barcus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Barcus. The network helps show where Kyle Barcus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kyle Barcus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kyle Barcus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kyle Barcus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kyle Barcus. Kyle Barcus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Barcus, Kyle, et al.. (2025). Charge transfer in hybrid quantum dot / metal-organic framework systems: Current understanding and future challenges. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 542. 216841–216841. 2 indexed citations
2.
Barcus, Kyle, et al.. (2023). Quantifying Ligand Binding to the Surface of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 145(30). 16821–16827. 17 indexed citations
3.
Barcus, Kyle, et al.. (2022). Influence of Polymer Characteristics on the Self-Assembly of Polymer-Grafted Metal–Organic Framework Particles. ACS Nano. 16(11). 18168–18177. 28 indexed citations
4.
Kim, Jin Yeong, Kyle Barcus, & Seth M. Cohen. (2021). Controlled Two-Dimensional Alignment of Metal–Organic Frameworks in Polymer Films. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 143(10). 3703–3706. 38 indexed citations
5.
Kalaj, Mark, Kyle C. Bentz, Sergio Ayala, et al.. (2020). MOF-Polymer Hybrid Materials: From Simple Composites to Tailored Architectures. Chemical Reviews. 120(16). 8267–8302. 694 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Barcus, Kyle & Seth M. Cohen. (2020). Free-standing metal–organic framework (MOF) monolayers by self-assembly of polymer-grafted nanoparticles. Chemical Science. 11(32). 8433–8437. 41 indexed citations
7.
Kalaj, Mark, Mohammad R. Momeni, Kyle C. Bentz, et al.. (2019). Halogen bonding in UiO-66 frameworks promotes superior chemical warfare agent simulant degradation. Chemical Communications. 55(24). 3481–3484. 83 indexed citations
8.
Katayama, Yuji, Mark Kalaj, Kyle Barcus, & Seth M. Cohen. (2019). Self-Assembly of Metal–Organic Framework (MOF) Nanoparticle Monolayers and Free-Standing Multilayers. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 141(51). 20000–20003. 114 indexed citations
9.
Barcus, Kyle, et al.. (2017). Solution-Based Large-Area Assembly of Coaxial Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Nanowires for Fast Ambipolar Charge Transport. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 9(19). 16397–16403. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026