This map shows the geographic impact of Kurt Sandkuhl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kurt Sandkuhl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kurt Sandkuhl more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kurt Sandkuhl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kurt Sandkuhl. The network helps show where Kurt Sandkuhl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kurt Sandkuhl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kurt Sandkuhl.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kurt Sandkuhl based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kurt Sandkuhl. Kurt Sandkuhl is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sandkuhl, Kurt, et al.. (2019). On challenges of cyber and information security management in federal structures - The example of German public administration. 2443. 1–13.
5.
Sandkuhl, Kurt & H. Lehmann. (2018). Dynamics in Information Demand Patterns : A Case Study from Situative Maintenance. 2218. 70–81.1 indexed citations
6.
Sandkuhl, Kurt, et al.. (2017). Towards A Method for Developing Reference Enterprise Architectures. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
Fellmann, Michael, et al.. (2016). SPARQL Query Builders: Overview and Comparison.. 1684.4 indexed citations
9.
Sandkuhl, Kurt, et al.. (2015). Initial Experiences in Developing a Reference Enterprise Architecture for Small and Medium-Sized Utilities. 1497. 31–40.2 indexed citations
10.
Sandkuhl, Kurt, Jānis Stirna, Anne Persson, & Matthias Wißotzki. (2014). Enterprise Modeling.46 indexed citations
11.
Koç, Hasan, et al.. (2014). Ontology Development for Intelligent Information Logistics in Transportation. 2–17.4 indexed citations
12.
Jugel, Dierk, Kurt Sandkuhl, & Alfréd Zimmermann. (2014). Towards Visual EAM Analytics: Explorative Research Study with Master Students.. Reutlingen University Academic Bibliography (Reutlingen University). 13–22.1 indexed citations
Sandkuhl, Kurt. (2011). Improving Engineering Change Management with Information Demand Patterns. 47–58.3 indexed citations
15.
Sandkuhl, Kurt. (2010). Capturing product development knowledge with task patterns: evaluation of economic effects. Control and Cybernetics. 39(1). 259–273.9 indexed citations
16.
Hammar, Karl & Kurt Sandkuhl. (2010). The state of ontology pattern research a systematic review of ISWC, ESWC and ASWC 2005-2009. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 5–18.8 indexed citations
17.
Sandkuhl, Kurt, et al.. (2008). Enterprise Ontology based Artefact Management. GI Jahrestagung (2). 681–687.1 indexed citations
18.
Sandkuhl, Kurt, et al.. (2007). ENTERPRISE ONTOLOGY AND FEATURE MODEL INTEGRATION - Approach and Experiences from an Industrial Case. 264–269.2 indexed citations
19.
Levashova, Tatiana, et al.. (2006). Context-based Modelling of Information Demand: Approaches from Information Logistics and Decision Support. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1511–1522.2 indexed citations
20.
Sandkuhl, Kurt. (1997). Features of Successful Telecooperation Systems: The Technological Viewpoint. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 301–304.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.