Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Insolation-driven 100,000-year glacial cycles and hysteresis of ice-sheet volume
2013314 citationsAyako Abe‐Ouchi, Fuyuki Saito et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Kunio Takahashi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kunio Takahashi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kunio Takahashi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kunio Takahashi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kunio Takahashi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kunio Takahashi. The network helps show where Kunio Takahashi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kunio Takahashi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kunio Takahashi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kunio Takahashi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kunio Takahashi. Kunio Takahashi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tsujimoto, Megumu, Kunio Takahashi, Toru Hirawake, & Mitsuo Fukuchi. (2006). Distribution of Copepoda along 140°E in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean. Institutional Repository National Institute of Polar Research (National Institute of Polar Research (Japan)). 20(20). 140–146.2 indexed citations
13.
Takahashi, Kunio, So Kawaguchi, Masaki Kobayashi, & Tatsuki Toda. (2004). The variability in abundance of eugregarines living in the Antarctic krill. Institutional Repository National Institute of Polar Research (National Institute of Polar Research (Japan)). 17(17). 16–25.17 indexed citations
Saito, Shigeki, et al.. (2003). Introduction of Micro-Manipulation by Adhesional Force and Dielectric Force. TechConnect Briefs. 1(2003). 518–521.
16.
Takahashi, Kunio, So Kawaguchi, Masaki Kobayashi, et al.. (2002). Zooplankton distribution patterns in relation to the Antarctic Polar Front Zones Recorded by Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) during 1999/2000 Kaiyo Maru cruise. Institutional Repository National Institute of Polar Research (National Institute of Polar Research (Japan)). 15. 97–107.15 indexed citations
17.
Takahashi, Kunio, N. A. Burnham, Mario Hubert, & Tadao Onzawa. (1997). Stiffness of Measurement System and Significant Figures of Displacement which are Required to Interpret Adhesional Force Curves. IEICE Transactions on Electronics. 80(2). 255–262.4 indexed citations
Takahashi, Kunio, et al.. (1992). Rough Classification by Grouping. Transactions of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers. 75(9). 1626–1627.1 indexed citations
20.
Ishihara, Yoshihiro, et al.. (1988). Analgesic effect of low energy laser to finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis.. 51(2). 73–77.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.