Kô Sakai

765 citations
63 papers · 418 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Kô Sakai

58 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Kô Sakai
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 320
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 124
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 16
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 78
  • Sensory Systems 11
Replace P.C. Teo with:
P.C. Teo United States
Harris Nover United States
Brian Potetz United States
Elad Eban Israel
Sishu Shankar Muni India
Lowell Jacobson United States
Juan A. Sigüenza Spain
Risto Miikkulainen United States
Harry Voorhees United States
Minjoon Kouh United States
Kô Sakai relative to P.C. Teo United States P.C. Teo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
P.C. Teo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kô Sakai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kô Sakai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kô Sakai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kô Sakai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kô Sakai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kô Sakai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kô Sakai. The network helps show where Kô Sakai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kô Sakai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kô Sakai Line = papers co-authored together Kô Sakai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200652
2 199540
3 200035
4 201221
5 200421
6 201316
7 200816
8 198914
9 200414
10 202012
11 201311
12 200211
13 201411
14 201510
15 201010
16 200610
17
A Study on Boolean Constraint Solvers.
19917
18 20146
19 19946
20 20225

About Kô Sakai

Kô Sakai is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (47 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (28 papers), Color Science and Applications (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers), Color perception and design (6 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (320 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (124 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (16 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (78 citations) and Sensory Systems (11 citations). Kô Sakai has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Leif H. Finkel, Shigeru Tanaka, Nobuhiko Wagatsuma, Keiichi Kondo, Tadashi Sugihara, Hiroshi Tamura, Yoshihisa Tsuji, Atsushi Kodama, Kouji Kimura and Y. Yamane. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Neurocomputing, Frontiers in Psychology, Vision Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact