Klaus‐Peter Stengele

799 total citations
19 papers, 660 citations indexed

About

Klaus‐Peter Stengele is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Klaus‐Peter Stengele has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 660 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Organic Chemistry and 5 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Klaus‐Peter Stengele's work include DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (11 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (9 papers) and Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (5 papers). Klaus‐Peter Stengele is often cited by papers focused on DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (11 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (9 papers) and Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (5 papers). Klaus‐Peter Stengele collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Klaus‐Peter Stengele's co-authors include Wolfgang Pfleiderer, Mark M. Somoza, Nicole Kretschy, Ann‐Katrin Holik, Veronika Somoza, Ahmad Hasan, Richard A. Sachleben, Kenneth R. Isham, Robert S. Foote and Irene M. Lagoja and has published in prestigious journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Nature Nanotechnology and Chemistry - A European Journal.

In The Last Decade

Klaus‐Peter Stengele

19 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Klaus‐Peter Stengele Germany 11 388 215 194 132 58 19 660
Jan Willem de Vries Netherlands 15 573 1.5× 136 0.6× 109 0.6× 146 1.1× 39 0.7× 33 900
De‐en Sun China 10 501 1.3× 145 0.7× 172 0.9× 202 1.5× 59 1.0× 19 672
Kevin J Luebke United States 16 483 1.2× 80 0.4× 86 0.4× 170 1.3× 35 0.6× 25 726
Jong-Mok Kim United States 10 306 0.8× 129 0.6× 167 0.9× 164 1.2× 26 0.4× 16 657
Jean‐Marie Swiecicki France 14 434 1.1× 76 0.4× 136 0.7× 72 0.5× 47 0.8× 19 621
Viktoriia Postupalenko France 15 351 0.9× 193 0.9× 159 0.8× 52 0.4× 28 0.5× 23 636
Alexander A. Kislukhin United States 9 203 0.5× 183 0.9× 225 1.2× 78 0.6× 112 1.9× 14 630
Jeannine Hess Switzerland 14 245 0.6× 183 0.9× 315 1.6× 172 1.3× 12 0.2× 25 750
Alessandro Spilotros Germany 10 431 1.1× 234 1.1× 51 0.3× 74 0.6× 25 0.4× 15 702
Todd M. Doran United States 17 612 1.6× 184 0.9× 293 1.5× 38 0.3× 73 1.3× 30 977

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus‐Peter Stengele

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus‐Peter Stengele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus‐Peter Stengele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus‐Peter Stengele more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus‐Peter Stengele

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus‐Peter Stengele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus‐Peter Stengele. The network helps show where Klaus‐Peter Stengele may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klaus‐Peter Stengele

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klaus‐Peter Stengele. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klaus‐Peter Stengele based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Klaus‐Peter Stengele. Klaus‐Peter Stengele is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Gatterdam, Volker, Andreas Frutiger, Klaus‐Peter Stengele, et al.. (2021). Author Correction: Focal molography is a new method for the in situ analysis of molecular interactions in biological samples. Nature Nanotechnology. 16(5). 606–606. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gatterdam, Volker, Andreas Frutiger, Klaus‐Peter Stengele, et al.. (2017). Focal molography is a new method for the in situ analysis of molecular interactions in biological samples. Nature Nanotechnology. 12(11). 1089–1095. 35 indexed citations
3.
Holik, Ann‐Katrin, et al.. (2016). Express photolithographic DNA microarray synthesis with optimized chemistry and high-efficiency photolabile groups. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 14(1). 14–14. 40 indexed citations
4.
Kretschy, Nicole, Ann‐Katrin Holik, Veronika Somoza, Klaus‐Peter Stengele, & Mark M. Somoza. (2015). o‐Nitrobenzyl‐photolabile Gruppen der nächsten Generation in der lichtgesteuerten Chemie und der Synthese von Mikroarrays. Angewandte Chemie. 127(29). 8675–8679. 8 indexed citations
5.
Kretschy, Nicole, Ann‐Katrin Holik, Veronika Somoza, Klaus‐Peter Stengele, & Mark M. Somoza. (2015). Next‐Generation o‐Nitrobenzyl Photolabile Groups for Light‐Directed Chemistry and Microarray Synthesis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 54(29). 8555–8559. 71 indexed citations
6.
Forsström, Björn, Klaus‐Peter Stengele, Thomas J. Albert, et al.. (2014). Proteome-wide Epitope Mapping of Antibodies Using Ultra-dense Peptide Arrays. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 13(6). 1585–1597. 100 indexed citations
8.
Stengele, Klaus‐Peter, et al.. (2005). RECENT HIGHLIGHTS ON PHOTOLITHIC OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY IN SITU SYNTHESIS. Nucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids. 24(5-7). 891–896. 10 indexed citations
9.
Lagoja, Irene M., et al.. (2004). New Types of Very Efficient Photolabile Protecting Groups Based upon the [2‐(2‐Nitrophenyl)propoxy]carbonyl (NPPOC) Moiety. Helvetica Chimica Acta. 87(3). 620–659. 73 indexed citations
10.
Wöll, Dominik, Klaus‐Peter Stengele, Todd Richmond, et al.. (2004). Triplet‐Sensitized Photodeprotection of Oligonucleotides in Solution and on Microarray Chips. Helvetica Chimica Acta. 87(1). 28–45. 45 indexed citations
11.
Wöll, Dominik, et al.. (2003). More Efficient Photolithographic Synthesis of DNA-Chips by Photosensitization. Nucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids. 22(5-8). 1395–1398. 10 indexed citations
12.
Hasan, Ahmad, Klaus‐Peter Stengele, Kenneth R. Isham, et al.. (1997). Photolabile protecting groups for nucleosides: Synthesis and photodeprotection rates. Tetrahedron. 53(12). 4247–4264. 148 indexed citations
13.
PFLEIDERER, W., et al.. (1995). How to Synthesize A tRNA?. Nucleosides and Nucleotides. 14(3-5). 843–846. 3 indexed citations
14.
Stengele, Klaus‐Peter, et al.. (1995). Nucleosides. Part LIX. The 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethylsulfonyl (Npes) Group: A New Type of Protection in Nucleoside Chemistry. Helvetica Chimica Acta. 78(7). 1705–1737. 11 indexed citations
15.
Stengele, Klaus‐Peter & Wolfgang Pfleiderer. (1991). ChemInform Abstract: Improved Synthesis of Oligodeoxyribonucleotides.. ChemInform. 22(5). 101–2. 1 indexed citations
16.
Pfleiderer, Wolfgang, et al.. (1991). Model Studies Towards the Automated Synthesis of tRNAs. Nucleosides and Nucleotides. 10(1-3). 377–382. 3 indexed citations
17.
Stengele, Klaus‐Peter, et al.. (1990). Isolation and Characterization of Diastereomeric 2′-Oeoxy-ribonucleoside-3′-phosphoramidites. Nucleosides and Nucleotides. 9(3). 423–427. 3 indexed citations
18.
Stengele, Klaus‐Peter & Wolfgang Pfleiderer. (1990). Improved synthesis of oligodeoxyribonucleotides. Tetrahedron Letters. 31(18). 2549–2552. 53 indexed citations
19.
Charubala, Ramamurthy, Klaus‐Peter Stengele, & Wolfgang Pfleiderer. (1989). Stereochemical Problems in Oligonucleotide Synthesis. Nucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids. 8(5). 1007–1010. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026